SJWs harass and censor a reporter for trying to take pictures....viral video!

[Totsuka No Tsurugi]

[video=youtube;xRlRAyulN4o]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRlRAyulN4o[/video]

A bunch of overly sensitive uber-liberal ***** pc SJWs were protesting/making a "free space" on their college campus.

In comes a school reporter wanting to take pictures....which you know, is what they do and fully covered by his first amendment rights...."Freedom of the Press".
However, for SJWs....the first amendment only works if it's in THEIR favor and in this viral video they show their true colors.

 

[Multiply]

So you're mad they didn't throw down their rights to make room for his?

 

[LustyLover]

"Don't get close to us, don't push us," -proceeds to rush onto him and push him-

 

[Yubel]

So, what were they trying to hide?

 

[Zavage10]

Lol fox news was trying to twist their protest into being about micheal brown. Thsts why they weren't having anything to do with the media.

 

[Fountain]

This was hard for me to watch, what a bunch of clowns.

 

[Punk Hazard]

So they didn't want to be photographed. Could he not just, idk, go find a different group who were okay with it?

 

[The Necromancer]

How do people still not understand that the Bill of Rights protects from the GOVERNMENT? Freedom of press means the government can't censor you, it has nothing to do with everyone else.

 

[Punk Hazard]

How do people still not understand that the Bill of Rights protects from the GOVERNMENT? Freedom of press means the government can't censor you, it has nothing to do with everyone else.

Wait, don't you still need people's permission to distribute their image? Isn't that why you need to get people to sign a waiver when you upload videos of them on YouTube and stuff?

 

[The Necromancer]

Wait, don't you still need people's permission to distribute their image? Isn't that why you need to get people to sign a waiver when you upload videos of them on YouTube and stuff?

Yes. That's why if freedom of press applied to everyone, no one would ever need permission for anything.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Yes. That's why if freedom of press applied to everyone, no one would ever need permission for anything.

Then I don't see why this particular incident was made into such a big deal. If the First Amendment says he can film, but also says he can't film people who say they don't want to be filmed, then just go find people who are okay with it and leave people who say they don't want to be filmed alone.

I don't get this thread. You're respecting the dude's right to film, but not their right to say they don't want to be? That doesn't make sense.

 

[The Necromancer]

Then I don't see why this particular incident was made into such a big deal. If the First Amendment says he can film, but also says he can't film people who say they don't want to be filmed, then just go find people who are okay with it and leave people who say they don't want to be filmed alone.

I don't get this thread. You're respecting the dude's right to film, but not their right to say they don't want to be? That doesn't make sense.

Ex****ingactly.

 

[Robot Boy]

Then I don't see why this particular incident was made into such a big deal. If the First Amendment says he can film, but also says he can't film people who say they don't want to be filmed, then just go find people who are okay with it and leave people who say they don't want to be filmed alone.

I don't get this thread. You're respecting the dude's right to film, but not their right to say they don't want to be? That doesn't make sense.

You clearly didn't watch the video.

 

[Punk Hazard]

You clearly didn't watch the video.

I did. When I say I don't know why it was made into such a big deal, I mean I don't get why there needed to be an argument and yelling and chanting. The second they said "We don't want to filmed," he should have said "Okay" and walked away and found other people who were okay with being filmed. His insistent "FIRST AMENDMENT SAYS I CAN FILM THO" just made the entire situation so much more stupider than it should have been.

Also, after watching it a second time, what the ****? They said the students were walking in that direction and he'd need to move, so what does he do when a large group of people is walking towards him? Well, what any reasonable person would do and just stand there like a moron and say "UH YOU'RE PUSHING ME."

Seriously, whoever is behind that camera seems like they realized they found trouble and instigated it further because it gave them a story and knew it'd give them views.

 

[Multiply]

I did. When I say I don't know why it was made into such a big deal, I mean I don't get why there needed to be an argument and yelling and chanting. The second they said "We don't want to filmed," he should have said "Okay" and walked away and found other people who were okay with being filmed. His insistent "FIRST AMENDMENT SAYS I CAN FILM THO" just made the entire situation so much more stupider than it should have been.

Also, after watching it a second time, what the ****? They said the students were walking in that direction and he'd need to move, so what does he do when a large group of people is walking towards him? Well, what any reasonable person would do and just stand there like a moron and say "UH YOU'RE PUSHING ME."

Seriously, whoever is behind that camera seems like they realized they found trouble and instigated it further because it gave them a story and knew it'd give them views.

This ^.

 

[Aim64C]

So, what were they trying to hide?

The fact that most of the people there were not actually students at the university.

Also, the fact that the kid leading this protest is the son of a multi-millionaire railroad owner.

Lol fox news was trying to twist their protest into being about micheal brown. Thsts why they weren't having anything to do with the media.

ABC is the local news affiliate and was not really covering the news story. None of the local or national news outlets really had much in the way of reporters on the ground.

The pictures came from a few of Mizzou's own media students - such as this one - who was a reporter for the school paper.

I did. When I say I don't know why it was made into such a big deal, I mean I don't get why there needed to be an argument and yelling and chanting. The second they said "We don't want to filmed," he should have said "Okay" and walked away and found other people who were okay with being filmed. His insistent "FIRST AMENDMENT SAYS I CAN FILM THO" just made the entire situation so much more stupider than it should have been.

It's a public space. No one has the right to deny him free passage, nor is he prohibited from recording in public.

Also, after watching it a second time, what the ****? They said the students were walking in that direction and he'd need to move, so what does he do when a large group of people is walking towards him? Well, what any reasonable person would do and just stand there like a moron and say "UH YOU'RE PUSHING ME."

One who is interested in documenting the event that is supposed to be raising awareness to the issues experienced by the people in the protest.

Seriously, whoever is behind that camera seems like they realized they found trouble and instigated it further because it gave them a story and knew it'd give them views.

He was one of the only reporters there.

The fact is that these protesters were doing this to everyone. They just formed a circle and pushed everyone out of the way to make a 'safe space' for 'blacks only.'

Frankly, if you don't understand how that's trouble in and of itself, then you're a grape ripe for the press.

 

[Dark Sonic]

Lol fox news was trying to twist their protest into being about micheal brown. Thsts why they weren't having anything to do with the media.

Fox news resort to lying and twisting the truth in order to get ratings. They have no shame lol

 

[SSStylish]

It's a public space. No one has the right to deny him free passage, nor is he prohibited from recording in public.

This right here. I don't get why people disliked the OP. Is what Aim64C said not correct for the US? Here in Germany it's a well known law.

 

[Punk Hazard]

This right here. I don't get why people disliked the OP. Is what Aim64C said not correct for the US? Here in Germany it's a well known law.

He has the right to record a public space, he does not have the right to record people who say they don't want to be recorded. The matter is simple: His rights don't overruled theirs. If he wanted to continue recording in this public place, he would simply need to find a group of people who are okay with being in his recording. If someone notices him and says "Hey, I don't want to be recorded," he can't record them.

 

[SSStylish]

He has the right to record a public space, he does not have the right to record people who say they don't want to be recorded. The matter is simple: His rights don't overruled theirs. If he wanted to continue recording in this public place, he would simply need to find a group of people who are okay with being in his recording. If someone notices him and says "Hey, I don't want to be recorded," he can't record them.

Is it really the way it is in the US? Kinda strange. So only one person in a public place needs to say that he doesn't want to be filmed and that's it? So you can't film in a public place if people are against that? Isn't it against the law to prohibit that? :/