[Photoshop] sigs?

[Mina..]

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

This one's too big, didn't realise -_-

You must be registered for see images

You must be registered for see images

All from these past 2 or 3 weeks.
I only signed in to get some good comments so
CnC....:3

 

[Sin]

They're really good. I see lots of improvement. >.< (Looks at my signatures) Better than mine. Their colourful but also are done in a good way.

No CnC as I am not as good.

B.o.B (Right?) In the first one

Knight and Day.. bleh second one

4th one.. Emma Watson.. o.o

 

[-The Agent-]

Love the B.o.B. and Knight and day sigs. 10/10 on both

 

[Mina..]

They're really good. I see lots of improvement. >.< (Looks at my signatures) Better than mine. Their colourful but also are done in a good way.

No CnC as I am not as good.

B.o.B (Right?) In the first one

Knight and Day.. bleh second one

4th one.. Emma Watson.. o.o

You just have a different style. :x
Thanks...yeah 1. B.o.B

Love the B.o.B. and Knight and day sigs. 10/10 on both

Thanks

 

[Preta]

Biggest critique is that the style of 3 out of the 4 has really been done to death. If you're good enough to make these sigs, you're good enough to start trying something original.

All of the 3 flare crazy sigs have the same issues. Over-pixelation, lack of depth, non-existent lighting, and overbearing contrast. This sig style was always an attempt at sneaking past the bothersome task of shading, but just because the sig has a few flares on it, does not mean your characters and effects are actually realistically reacting to the light source, which is the whole point of having a light source to being with.

I like the third. Great use of colors, actually some good depth (thought with a darker bg and some less visible layers that could be even better), and a good concept. Only problems with it are that the girl seems stretched, and she is very pixelated against a very smooth bg so the blending is tough.

Overall it is very good work but it is really just c4d/flare abuse and I think you can do much better than that tired style.<3

 

[\PhuriouS/]

pro skill <3

 

[Mina..]

pro skill <3

No, not really.

Biggest critique is that the style of 3 out of the 4 has really been done to death. If you're good enough to make these sigs, you're good enough to start trying something original.

All of the 3 flare crazy sigs have the same issues. Over-pixelation, lack of depth, non-existent lighting, and overbearing contrast. This sig style was always an attempt at sneaking past the bothersome task of shading, but just because the sig has a few flares on it, does not mean your characters and effects are actually realistically reacting to the light source, which is the whole point of having a light source to being with.

I like the third. Great use of colors, actually some good depth (thought with a darker bg and some less visible layers that could be even better), and a good concept. Only problems with it are that the girl seems stretched, and she is very pixelated against a very smooth bg so the blending is tough.

Overall it is very good work but it is really just c4d/flare abuse and I think you can do much better than that tired style.<3

Idk who you are but thanks.
Yeah, I know depth sucks a bit.

 

[New DaY]

Biggest critique is that the style of 3 out of the 4 has really been done to death. If you're good enough to make these sigs, you're good enough to start trying something original.

All of the 3 flare crazy sigs have the same issues. Over-pixelation, lack of depth, non-existent lighting, and overbearing contrast. This sig style was always an attempt at sneaking past the bothersome task of shading, but just because the sig has a few flares on it, does not mean your characters and effects are actually realistically reacting to the light source, which is the whole point of having a light source to being with.

I like the third. Great use of colors, actually some good depth (thought with a darker bg and some less visible layers that could be even better), and a good concept. Only problems with it are that the girl seems stretched, and she is very pixelated against a very smooth bg so the blending is tough.

Overall it is very good work but it is really just c4d/flare abuse and I think you can do much better than that tired style.<3

Absolutely agree (whoever you are ).

I realy like 3rd

 

[Mina..]

Absolutely agree (whoever you are ).

I realy like 3rd

Alright, thanks. o^o

 

[-Tauburn-]

O_O wow theyre awesome, *thinks about my works in comparsion* damn i suck

 

[JR4040]

B.O.B. only!

 

[Xilef]

they are not bad but Preta said pretty much everything I came up with in my examination of your work. Keep practicing and define your own unique style then people will truly be beyond amazed at what you accomplish

 

[Kazamori]

Nice work.

 

[MentalJerk]

Why the hell critiques appear on only decent-looking sigs threads? =| There are alot of idiots out there who needs support. I liek all of dem. Though they're kinda monotonic and dull.

Now I feel like doing sigs! :3

 

[Yono]

The first one, the focal needs to be blurred. I also would've liked to see it a bit more vibrant.
The second one, the girl is stretched. The focal doesn't blend in well. The distorted arms of the girl looks weird.
The third one, the render was badly chosen because the colors for the background and the render are unappealing, it looks really gross, makes me think of puke, although I guess someone else might think differently.
The fourth one, the body was blended in so much that I had to analyze it closely to realize that her body was in there and it wasn't just some blurry effect, it's causing floating head syndrome.

These are all very, very nice tags. Overall though, they all look a little too dull, just because of the lack of vibrance. I do some of my tags like that as well, but I guess it might be personal opinion on weather an image should be less vibrant or not.