[Question] Signature of the Week
- Thread starter Grim
- Start date
- Status
Could you not have put forward your opinion in a more respectful manner? Obviously someone put some time and effort into making the new award. The least you can do is say you don't like it in a nice way.
And how does this not have anything to with signatures, typing something at the bottom right page is usually is your signature. I guess many of you have never written a real signature but oh well. I think it's really good and well made.
KiraGirl K
Active member
No. Personally I prefer this one any day over the previous one (I was also the one who asked for a new medal). The award was made very well, in the least it's not of a lesser quality than most of the other awards so that's already a complete BS reason. But above all the previous award was not only weird, it had absolutely nothing to do with a signature, at best it looked like a mutated feather if you have a lot of imagination. The current one actually has a real connection with a signature as normally you sign something at the bottom of a paper, I mean your signature is also posted under your post. So that's even more of a worthless reason than the previous one.
I am confused - do you really not know who approved it when it's uploaded and added to the list? I believe you are well aware of who made it as well. I get that you liked that Rooster's crown image better( and somehow it meant signature for you) but you could have worded your post better. There was no need to be rude about it.
- Status