Signals

[Aim64C]

You must be registered for see links

Brett M. Kavanaugh thanked President Trump for his nomination to the Supreme Court on Monday night. Almost immediately, he made a thoroughly strange and quite possibly bogus claim.

“No president has ever consulted more widely, or talked with more people from more backgrounds, to seek input about a Supreme Court nomination,” Kavanaugh said.

It may seem like a throwaway line — a bit of harmless political hyperbole. But this was also the first public claim from a potential Supreme Court justice who will be tasked with interpreting and parsing the law down to the letter. Specificity and precision are the name of the game in Kavanaugh's chosen profession. How on earth could he be so sure?

You must be registered for see links

An attorney working for Ken Starr, Kavanaugh played a lead role in drafting the Starr Report, which urged the impeachment of President Bill Clinton.[2] Kavanaugh led the investigation into the suicide of Clinton aide Vince Foster. After the 2000 U.S. presidential election, in which Kavanaugh worked for the George W. Bush campaign in the Florida recount, Kavanaugh joined Bush's staff, where he led the Administration's effort to identify and confirm judicial nominees.[3]

...

After his Supreme Court clerkship, Kavanaugh worked for Starr again, now as an Associate Counsel in the Office of Independent Counsel, where he handled a number of the novel constitutional and legal issues presented during that investigation and was a principal author of the Starr Report to Congress on the Monica Lewinsky-Bill Clinton and Vincent Foster investigation.[15] There, Kavanaugh argued on broad grounds for the impeachment of Bill Clinton.[16] Kavanaugh was later a partner at the law firm of Kirkland & Ellis.[14] In Swidler & Berlin v. United States (1998), Kavanaugh argued his first and only case before the Supreme Court when he asked it to disregard attorney–client privilege in relation to the investigation of Foster's death.[17] The Supreme Court rejected Kavanaugh's arguments by a vote of 6–3.[18]

You must be registered for see links

Swidler & Berlin v. United States, 524 U.S. 399 (1998),[1] was a case in which the Supreme Court of the United States held that the death of an attorney's client does not terminate attorney–client privilege with respect to records of confidential communications between the attorney and the client.

The case concerned the efforts of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr to gain access to notes taken by Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster's attorney, James Hamilton, during a conversation with Foster regarding the White House travel office controversy shortly before Foster's suicide.

Leben, wast ist das?
signal seihst du das?
Rade die du nicht weisst
aus eigenem willen
Leben... wast ist das?
signal, seihst du das!?
Rade die du nicht weisst...
Seih mit dienen augen!

You must be registered for see links

Rade die du nicht weisst, aus eigenem willen.

Spoiler

Former Ambassador Leo Wanta, jailed for years and framed by the Bush and Clinton crime families, said during a recent radio interview there is no doubt in his mind Vince Foster, chief White House counsel to President Clinton, was murdered only weeks after giving Foster $250 million dollars earmarked for the Childrens' Defense Fund.

Wanta also said Monday on Greg Szymanski's nightly edition of the Investigative Journal that he was aware Foster was about to testify against Clinton, providing another motive for Foster's untimely death.

Although Wanta had no idea what The Children's Fund was all about, later a financial investigator, Marco Saba of the Organized Crime Observatory (OBO) in Switzerland wrote this about turned out to be a secret fund:

"One component of this information concerns the activities of the CIA operative known as Mrs Hillary Rodham Clinton. For some years prior to the elevation of her husband, Bill, a CIA operative like his ''CIA wife'', Hillary had been in control of an organization calling itself the Childrens' Defense Fund. Executive Order 12333 (1981) of President Reagan, the US intelligence services were authorized to operate what became known as Title 18, Section 6 USG corporations for intelligence purposes, and to deny any intelligence community connection (that is, to lie about their real purpose).

Coss-Talk.

 

[Azarath Metrion Zinthos]

Are you German? I should take the silence as a yes.

 

[Aim64C]

Are you German?

Ethnically, yes. My paternal lineage is almost entirely German, at least once they all immigrated here. The surname extends from the town of Graz, Austria. Maternal lineage is fairly strong German with Cherokee American Native on the Maternal side.

Ah... now it makes sense... Gradec.... "Of Gradec." I see....

 

[minamoto]

du kannst mir foolen nichts...............du kannst through die illuzion sehen nichts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..

 

[Funky Tiger]

im gay

 

[Aim64C]

du kannst mir foolen nichts...............du kannst through die illuzion sehen nichts!!!!!!!!!!!!!!..

Perhaps. Perhaps not.

For me, it's not so much about the illusion, so much as it is your goal. The illusion is water under the bridge, a curious thing to watch and look at, as well as to poke at - maybe even swim in a little bit and see if I can touch the bottom.

But even if I could see through it and catch all the fishes... it doesn't get me to the other side of the river. Further, the illusion exists for a purpose. Destroying it without knowing why that would be is a very reckless action that, depending on the reason, could end quite tragically.

There are a couple things that I know for certain. Those limited number of things still allow me to bracket things into a fairly interesting range of possibilities. Even if the things I think I know are wrong, it means you must have deliberately tried to paint that picture, and that signaling such a false image to me is considered important-enough for a substantial amount of resources in the real world to be expended on it, time and attention being the most precious.

Which tells me everything I ultimately need to know, even if I can paper the walls in posts and red string crafting theories to explain why. The most simple answer is also the most encompassing of all of those. There is a phrase that I could use to respond... but it's poor form to say such things to shadows and puppets. Though I think you already know what it is.

If not... I'll let it be a mysterious mystery until you're willing to take off the mask. Those words are for you, and words I never was able to say back then.

Or do you cheat on mysterious mysteries and use Kamui to eavesdrop on things you shouldn't? There is a reason I have forbidden myself to use similar strategies. It is very easy to build a distorted view of someone's life after placing them under the microscope, and to run off into the weeds with what their actions mean.

Either way... you saw how I reacted in the beginning. Even if I saw exactly what was going on, if I thought it would put you in any danger, I would not call you on it, directly. Of course, that may be proof enough that I don't see what is going on.

Although... like I have said... dragons are absurd creatures. Right without any reason to be. It is like speaking in tongues, but when discussing the course of events or the destiny of a person. There are a couple others I've had a virtually telepathic connection to - curiously enough, an Austrian from Lengdorf.