So why isnt it creditable to use the anime as Naruto facts within the NB?!?! I mean it follows and explains situations more in depth than just manga.
For example???The anime contains a lot of mistakes/plotholes which just make no sense at all, that's why.
In the episode where Tobi fought Konan, he mentioned that both Konan and Nagato agreed with the Moon Eye Plan, yet Nagato seemed to have different plans himself, I checked, and Tobi never said this in the manga.For example???
Kish himself fails to follow databook facts and contradicts himself, plus the anime in most situations help us understand situations.The anime contains a lot of mistakes/plotholes which just make no sense at all, that's why.
When they were in their trip (on a boat) to the turtle island, they mentioned like 23023 times to Naruto about the war. The newest episodes about Kabuto showing his Edos (that was supposed to be kind of a surprise) and not give them like 2023020 months to prepare for the war.For example???
In the episode where Tobi fought Konan, he mentioned that both Konan and Nagato agreed with the Moon Eye Plan, yet Nagato seemed to have different plans himself, I checked, and Tobi never said this in the manga.
I made a thread about this a long time ago, and we agreed that this was a plothole and that the animators screwed up again.
I think the Anime should be used, within reason. Its all case-by-case basis.So why isnt it creditable to use the anime as Naruto facts within the NB?!?! I mean it follows and explains situations more in depth than just manga.
that's exactly how i feel, somethings are reasonab to conclude and some aren't. Just as when something isn't reasonable in the manga, we conclude it being plot-no-jutsuI think the Anime should be used, within reason. Its all case-by-case basis.