- Joined
- Apr 3, 2013
- Messages
- 5,133
- Reaction score
- 448
Sometimes people say that certain things didn't happen because of "plot". I think that is just an excuse. Kishi could have easily avoided the "plot" copouts with careful writing.
One clear example was Kabuto not using any Edo's as bodyguards. Clearly, having a bunch of Edos in the fight against Sasuke and Itachi would make reading the manga less enjoyable, so I can see why Kishi decided to not include them. But why be lazy about it? Why not just create a panel detailing a case where Kabuto cannot use Edos nearby him due to a drawback from controlling too many Edos? Something, anything.
Onoki survived two giant meteors smashing into his head. A simple way out of this plot hole would be to have Gaara pull him away with his sand at the last second so that Onoki would only suffer the shockwaves, which are still devastating.
Those are just examples and not the main point of this discussion.
I just want to know what you guys think.
Is "plot" necessary? Is it even excusable? Does resorting to Plot-no-Jutsu make the manga a better read than alternate ways of resolution?
One clear example was Kabuto not using any Edo's as bodyguards. Clearly, having a bunch of Edos in the fight against Sasuke and Itachi would make reading the manga less enjoyable, so I can see why Kishi decided to not include them. But why be lazy about it? Why not just create a panel detailing a case where Kabuto cannot use Edos nearby him due to a drawback from controlling too many Edos? Something, anything.
Onoki survived two giant meteors smashing into his head. A simple way out of this plot hole would be to have Gaara pull him away with his sand at the last second so that Onoki would only suffer the shockwaves, which are still devastating.
Those are just examples and not the main point of this discussion.
I just want to know what you guys think.
Is "plot" necessary? Is it even excusable? Does resorting to Plot-no-Jutsu make the manga a better read than alternate ways of resolution?