U guys are blind to ur ship.....naruto wasnt reacting to just hinata.....naruto has always been verbal.....he always yells out the person's name...ur interpretation is blinded by love for hinata....im not saying he wasnt...but with no verbal indication. ...its more likely he wasnt....
What you are stating operates under the assumption that Naruto recognized the 'call' as being from Hinata. While 'we' like to think Naruto has special feelings for Hinata and jump to the conclusion that Naruto is reacting because -it is- Hinata (as opposed to reacting because -of- Hinata), it is clearly shown that Naruto reacts to something, then 'takes in' the sensation.
This, right after "Naruto-Kun."
Now, you can argue "blinded by ship" all you want - but the fact is that, at the very least, Kishimoto has been predictable in his depiction of Hinata in symbolic roles alongside Naruto. Even if we want to make the argument that none of this has any implication for the kinetic plot and mechanical underpinnings, these types of events have been predictable for over a year, now (since well before that, actually).
Back when Hinata "held hands" with Naruto - there was the outrage: "Irrelevant! She has had her moment in the spot-light, but she's not a main character and we won't see her again!" Since then, she's racked up more panels than any of the other K-11 that aren't Team-7, and more panel time in the last 75 chapters than she had in the previous 400.
Now, I'm blatantly lumping you into that category that you may not belong to - but this isn't exactly my first rodeo.
There is a thing called reading comprehension. Honestly, they suck at evaluating it in pretty much all education systems.
There are three things to comprehend:
The Mechanical Underpinnings
The Mechanical Underpinnings are the construct of the world - it is where the story takes place, the environment, the rules and laws of physical behavior. The author is free to choose this environment, but the reader ultimately must be able to connect with the environment, as this is what the plot interacts with.
The Kinetic Plot
This is the trajectory of plot events as established by the mechanical underpinnings. A train rolling down a set of rails is not expected to suddenly take a left turn unless the rails indicate it will do so. Understanding the kinetic plot is key to building tension and comprehending where the author has intervened as the "Hand of God."
Which leads us to the Author's Intent
Comprehending the Author's intent is the realization that the story is not real, it was created for a specific purpose and characters made the decisions they made because the author chose to have them make those decisions. It is the realization that stories are not simulators and not supposed to be purely kinetic in nature. They are meant to carry a meaning, to be entertaining, and to be dramatic.
If you can't understand how things -should- work, then you have difficulty picking out where the author has intentionally tweaked things to do more than just 'protect' a character.
Sometimes, it is blatant - such as when a character seems out of character. Other times, it is very subtle - such as when a character is not mentioned as being present.
Very good authors can put their message into a story without it appearing unnatural - they can introduce drama and tension without making things feel melodramatic or 'over the top.' Very poor authors will simply talk about their story in flat sentences without ever being able to make you feel as if you are observing a scene.
Even in manga, where there is a visual component to assist - it is still as story being constructed by the author and the visual component is another dimension to consider. The ordering of events is just as important as the content of discussions. Though you have to be careful of misinterpreting "ruts" for plot significance. For example - I had a friend who wrote a few fan fictions way back when you were in diapers. Most of her characters had romantic encounters under a starry backdrop. Obviously, the stars (or being out under them) was an infinitely romantic concept to her and it worked its way into her writing without her being fully conscious of it. It wasn't because some Kupid-Madara was reflecting the light of Infinite-Aphrodite off of the stars, or something. It held no real plot significance but was revealing of the author.
Are simple visual parallels meant to hold significance - the visual component of art? ... Or are they just quirks of the author who has gotten in the habit of drawing things a certain way?
Here's a good prompt to get you into the mindset of analysis:
[video=youtube;ABcXyZn9xjg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ABcXyZn9xjg[/video]
