Science: Evolution of Monogamy in Humans the Result of Infanticide Risk

Krauq

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Apr 26, 2013
Messages
864
Reaction score
52
"emergence of monogamy males are more likely to care for their offspring. Where fathers care for young, not only can they protect infants from other males, but they can also share the burden of childcare."

 

FreakensteinAG

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,227
Reaction score
785
You wouldn't believe what was before that, though: one female, many males. Jealousy determined whether a baby lived or died. Jealous males would kill the offspring if they knew they weren't the father. This is why females would mate with multiple males to ensure their baby would live. This is also what helped the females develop multiple orgasms.

The more you know!

Also, great read :p
 

Aim64C

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Dec 18, 2012
Messages
3,681
Reaction score
608


The queen, in all her guises, must always be served.

Human mating characteristics mimic those of birds. Monogamy is as much a social construct as it is a genetic one. Polygyny is still relatively common and tends be cultural rather than genetic among humans - much like many species of birds.

This also explains the high rate of infidelity and why, worldwide, around half of the children born are not born to the 'political' father, but to some interloper.

Because a male in a political union is just as likely to pick up a mistress as one who is not (and that woman will compete with her for attention and resources), women developed "stealth-ovulation" to ensure that any man who wanted to guarantee pregnancy would be forced to mate multiple times. Thus - it was a way of dominating the male's time and forcing him to be more committed to his mate.

Also, as males became more intelligent - it was quite likely that females who expressed signs of ovulation were more likely to be fought over and less likely to successfully reproduce - which would not just make "stealth ovulation" beneficial, but "overt ovulation" would become detrimental.

No single trait we have is the result of one single 'thing' - though most can be traced back to one or two key drivers that comply with the Red Queen Hypothesis.
 

GOD2U

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 16, 2013
Messages
1,484
Reaction score
134
I think its only fair to bring back the volcano sacrifice. Sorry wrong thread.

On topic. I do think humans are polygamist by genetics in order to spread their DNA to continue the survival of the species and that monogamy is just a social construct to ensure there were less STDs and children.
 
Top