Ok you cant trip and your penis goes inside as simple as oiling a car especially a couch that sick mother **** raped that girl
Well there it is. Someone did mention it.1. They're both lying. He had *** with her but it wasn't rape, and she just cried rape. Not too much of a stretch as her and her friend were at his place for some reason, while the friend was having *** with him.
2. It was actually rape and this man just got out because of his money.
1)They both maybe lying. Girl might have lodged the report as an after thought. That point is ok- a fair possibility.1. They're both lying. He had *** with her but it wasn't rape, and she just cried rape. Not too much of a stretch as her and her friend were at his place for some reason, while the friend was having *** with him.
2. It was actually rape and this man just got out because of his money.
People were upset that the man was sentenced for prison? If so, I'm not sure why they'd be upset because what the man did was not acceptable. Yes someone stole some wine but he took their life, unsure what his intent was but it's acid, not tap water. In my country, recently there was this case where a dead man was charged with murder, unintentional murder. He committed suicide from jumping from his apartment floor and around the same time, a young man parked his car under the building and the man hit the roof of the car (of course died from the impact) but that's not the end of it, the young man in the car died also when the roof struck his head (due to the suicider's impact) and I think there has yet to be a trial, possibly because people are unsure what to make of it.There was a case recently in my country that a guy was stealing wine from a farmer's cellar all the time, and the farmer got fed up and wanted to punish the impostor by pouring acid in the wine. In the end, the guy died, and some of his friends that also drank from the stolen wine, got into hospital. The farmer was sentenced for prison, for murder. Many people got upset when the decision got published...but legally it was a fair sentence.
Yeah she had *** with him. They're both lying. If he would have told the truth that he had *** with her he would be put behind bars. Because he would be admitting he had sexual intercourse with her while she said (lied) he raped her. What would that look like? I had *** with her but I didn't rape her. If he would have admitted he had *** with her he would be tried guilty. Because that is consistent with the evidence. Some women do dumb stuff.1)They both maybe lying. Girl might have lodged the report as an after thought. That point is ok- a fair possibility.
But what bothers me is the assumption that she must have wanted to have *** with that guy- she asked if he had a friend and he said none and she went to sleep on the sofa. Now there is a possibility that the guy assumed she wanted it and would have no problem if he tried it after the friend was asleep. While the girl's story suggests she didn't fancy sleeping with the guy who had just slept with her friend too. And took offense to the assumption. Or may be she pulled him while half asleep and as the guy proceeded she woke up and realize that she didn't want it and rushed out.. there are a lot of scenarios there ..
2) Second one is also a definite possibility- he assumed she won't object since she had showed interest if he had a friend. But girl didn't want it any more or not with the guy her friend was with and objected to his taking the liberty of assumption. These are the situations quite likely to arise when people take such relations so lightly/ have been drinking a little too much to think properly. And I am leaning more towards this because of that ridiculous story of how he still didn't bother to fix his own garments even before going to wake her up to offer the Tshirt and how the DNA entered. But since she had shown interest earlier and not very particular about who it was, the case got thrown out.
Many more men have problem taking a no for a no, and proceed presuming they have a consent or will get anyway or that they will get away with it. Send me the details of the actual evidence and details of the hearing from the case, and then I will think about paying attention to your deductions.Yeah she had *** with him. They're both lying. If he would have told the truth that he had *** with her he would be put behind bars. Because he would be admitting he had sexual intercourse with her while she said (lied) he raped her. What would that look like? I had *** with her but I didn't rape her. If he would have admitted he had *** with her he would be tried guilty. Because that is consistent with the evidence. Some women do dumb stuff.
So a hoe won't try to pull the rape card? xdExactly why I want to become rich
sounds like some dude slipped on you tooMan, it seems the children of Narutobase have no idea how the law works.
Can't wait for them to be jailed because something "unlikely" happened. See how much you care about the technicalities of the law then.
Do I believe his story? **** no.sounds like some dude slipped on you too
Another self appointed advocate... Most people are mocking the "evidence" which was made public for a good reason. I wonder what makes you think anyone is obligated to prove he is rapist or not for calling him a liar. When an accused makes a statement usually either the whole statement is accepted as the truth or none of it. Half of it cannot be accepted without considering another half. And the another half here is not even made public. Adding to confusion and suspicion.Do I believe his story? **** no.
But can you prove he's a rapist? **** no.
And that's how the law works. The end. No use continuing this thread unless someone can prove he's a rapist.
Kiddos confusing personal opinions with fact every day on NB.
That's just an argument from authority. I'm quite sure the judge who supervised this trial is a legal expert.How about you provide us any link/opinion from a legal expert
It's not about his ridiculous excuse. It's about the girl not having been able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that she was raped. As you admitted, even you see a possibility of her lying as well.who commented on the issue and was not baffled at the acceptance of such a ridiculous story and was not left wondering exactly what kind of evidence it was that it couldn't be disclosed while such ridiculous excuse was allowed to stand.
What's your proof, again, that rape happened?So far accept for the rape apologetic
Neither Necromancer nor I am saying that the girl lied, we both rather believe her story. But that's. Just. Not. Proof.and those who tend to believe that women lie about consent a lot and cry rape as an after thought, people are having tough time digesting it.
I am sure the Croatian judge who declared **** fingering to be a form of handshake was also supposed to be a legal expert.That's just an argument from authority. I'm quite sure the judge who supervised this trial is a legal expert.
I am arguing against idiotic notion that people need to give proof for suspecting foul play and laughing at a ridiculous excuse, when some of the people asking for 'proof' would digest conspiracy theories when it suits them faster than glucose.what are you even arguing for now?
And what makes you think that the experts you are referring to are not any less idiotic than this judge you're talking about?I am sure the judge who declared **** fingering is a form of handshake was also supposed to be a legal expert.
It's quite interesting that you call our points 'conspiracy theory' now, despite you yourself admit that the girl may be lying as well.I am arguing against idiotic notion that people need to give proof for suspecting foul play but same people would digest conspiracy theories when it suits them faster than glucose.
I understand, but wouldn't it also create a bad precedent if we would just send to jail every rich guy who is accused of rape, only because his story is unlikely? What if he was just an average man, so you wouldn't be able to suspice that his wealth was behind it.Also I see it as a bad precedent in legal terms since it's already the second time when someone made excuse of accidental slipping.