The nerfing you give Mingo is ridiculousSabo wins. I wouldn't be surprised if Lucci was as strong Doffy so around the higher end of med-dif.
Isnt that kinda like asking what shows that shanks > G4 luffy? Like its just an obvious statement via portrayal.What about Sabo shows he can take Gear Fourth Luffy?
How so?Isnt that kinda like asking what shows that shanks > G4 luffy? Like its just an obvious statement via portrayal.
Lack of feats from shanks and lack of feats from sabo. Just ask the same question Riker asked but apply it to shanks instead of sabo and see if there is any evidence of shanks beating an opponent G4 luffy cant.How so?
You're question was answered in the first 5 words.Okay, this is nice and all, but my question stands.
Sounds like you don't know what the hell you're talking about and need to actually re read DR. Luffy was still injured in his fight with Fujitora but was still able to bruise him despite Fuji blocking the attack. Luffy did that with a freaking Elephant gun, no G4, no Grizzly Magnum but a basic G3 attack. And Fuji BLOCKED THE ATTACK, but was still bruised and knocked back against it. He also took a point blank ferocious tiger with no damage despite the attack clearly destroying whatever was behind him. He did all that whilst still being INJURED from his fight with Mingo.Lack of feats from shanks and lack of feats from sabo. Just ask the same question Riker asked but apply it to shanks instead of sabo and see if there is any evidence of shanks beating an opponent G4 luffy cant.
If you are asking about my second sentence , well look at sabos matchup with fujitora and he did well. Luffy got beat pretty swiftly. Just portrayal there on where luffy stood in regards to fuji imo.
I'm aware that portrayal can substitute feats. I'm asking WHAT shows that, whether it be portrayal or feats. What are you specific examples?Isnt that kinda like asking what shows that shanks > G4 luffy? Like its just an obvious statement via portrayal.
I think you need to relax a bit man.Sounds like you don't know what the hell you're talking about and need to actually re read DR. Luffy was still injured in his fight with Fujitora but was still able to bruise him despite Fuji blocking the attack. Luffy did that with a freaking Elephant gun, no G4, no Grizzly Magnum but a basic G3 attack. And Fuji BLOCKED THE ATTACK, but was still bruised and knocked back against it. He also took a point blank ferocious tiger with no damage despite the attack clearly destroying whatever was behind him. He did all that whilst still being INJURED from his fight with Mingo.
Sabo hasn't displayed a single thing suggesting he's stronger than Luffy, and the only reason people think he's stronger is because he's Dragons Right hand, which does not mean he's stronger at all really. And why should he be stronger? If were using the logic that if Dragons Right hand man isn't stronger than Luffy then the revos are weak, I could use the same logic for Luffy whos going to be the future PK.
The reality is that neither one of these guys are where they need to be at right now, the revos ain't ready to overthrow the WG and Luffy ain't ready to be PK yet.
Anyways portrayal puts Sabo above Luffy. Luffy had 3 days to recover from his injuries and managed to scratch fujitora but was pretty much beat by the raging tiger. Sabo can't even be hit by that attack. Sabo had a much longer fight with fuji to which ended in a stalemate. Luffy had to be carried off because his friends knew he would lose. Also we don't know burgesses strength, but Buurgess is a yonko commander and to be able to beat a yonko commander as easily as sabo did is very telling imo. And in my view says more about sabo's strength than burgesses weakness.I'm aware that portrayal can substitute feats. I'm asking WHAT shows that, whether it be portrayal or feats. What are you specific examples?
I think you need to relax a bit man.
Anyways portrayal puts Sabo above Luffy. Luffy had 3 days to recover from his injuries and managed to scratch fujitora but was pretty much beat by the raging tiger. Sabo can't even be hit by that attack.
Nope. Luffy's friends carried him off because they were strapped for time.Sabo had a much longer fight with fuji to which ended in a stalemate. Luffy had to be carried off because his friends knew he would lose.
We have no idea how Luffy would fair against Burgess or how Burgess would fair against Cracker, so the "Yonko commander" thing isn't an argument anyone can go by.Also we don't know burgesses strength, but Buurgess is a yonko commander and to be able to beat a yonko commander as easily as sabo did is very telling imo. And in my view says more about sabo's strength than burgesses weakness.
I think you are confusing portrayal with feats. BTW I am not really gonna debate this because portrayal is too subjectiveLMAOOO WHAT? Luffy wasn't hurt in the slightest by Raging Tiger, you call that being defeated? Luffy is immune to brute force, so a wave of pure brute force would affect him just as much as it would a Logia like Sabo.
Nope. Luffy's friends carried him off because they were strapped for time.
You must be registered for see images
You must be registered for see images
Not once did they express concern over Luffy winning or losing, they only cared about the fact that they simply didn't have time(Note that Barto stops Zoro and specifically says they have a schedule. When he yells at Luffy, he says he can't start a serious fight at a time like this.
Sabo fought Fujitora longer only because Sabo didn't have a schedule to keep.
We have no idea how Luffy would fair against Burgess or how Burgess would fair against Cracker, so the "Yonko commander" thing isn't an argument anyone can go by.
Anything else, or is that it
Nope I'm just stating facts, I am relaxed.I think you need to relax a bit man.
Anyways portrayal puts Sabo above Luffy. Luffy had 3 days to recover from his injuries and managed to scratch fujitora but was pretty much beat by the raging tiger. Sabo can't even be hit by that attack. Sabo had a much longer fight with fuji to which ended in a stalemate. Luffy had to be carried off because his friends knew he would lose. Also we don't know burgesses strength, but Buurgess is a yonko commander and to be able to beat a yonko commander as easily as sabo did is very telling imo. And in my view says more about sabo's strength than burgesses weakness.
What portrayal or standing do you speak of? Because from what I can see from the manga there ain't shit suggesting he's stronger.Huh why are people obsessed with G4? Why does Sabo have to be > G4?
Sabo > Luffy, that much is clear through portrayal and standings in the manga.
What portrayal or standing do you speak of? Because from what I can see from the manga there ain't shit suggesting he's stronger.
He's Dragons right hand man so he's automatically stronger? Hell no.
People want Sabo to be stronger because they THINK the revos are ready right now to overthrow the WG but they're not. Neither Luffy nor Sabo are ready to accomplish their goals yet, that's the reality of this whole thing.
You make it seem like theres some big gap between Luffy and Sabo when it clearly isn't, his feats don't show it and the manga doesn't support it. Sabo being stronger than Luffy while they were kids holds no weight now.Yes being Dragon's right hand alone is a big deal. It's like saying Beckman being Shanks right hand isn't a big deal. From all of the people in the massive organization like that, for Sabo to be the right hand of a Yonkou level man (Dragon recieves that kind of portrayal) is already a tall task for Luffy to overcome considering he was just shown getting shit on by a Yonkou's 3rd strongest.
Not only that, Sabo is like a what if scenario for if Ace didn't die at the war, Ace as it is, is already around Luffy's level. Give him two extra years and there is no doubt Ace would outclass Luffy.
Sabo was near equals with Ace as a child, Oda loves keeping those things consistent, but the biggest indicator is the fact that Sabo got Ace's fruit.
Sabo is literally the embodiment of a living Ace.
Last but not least he was clashing with a Marine Admiral, and had a better showing than Luffy did. Another portrayal point.
With all that said, yes there are plenty of things pointing at Sabo > Luffy, not the other way around.
But...you brought up feats lmfaoooI think you are confusing portrayal with feats. BTW I am not really gonna debate this because portrayal is too subjective
Saying Sabo is nowhere near Admiral is just flat out wrong, sure Fujitora wasn't going all out but he wasn't treating Sabo like damn fodder. While Luffy is not Yonko FM level, he may be nearing it but at best he's giving a good fight to cats like Vista.You make it seem like theres some big gap between Luffy and Sabo when it clearly isn't, his feats don't show it and the manga doesn't support it. Sabo being stronger than Luffy while they were kids holds no weight now.
Sabo ain't no where near Admiral level and Beckman is featless. Luffy while in G4 I could argue has Yonko FM level power while its active, only thing stopping him from soundly beating Doffy or Cracker was in fact the time limit. Oda had to put a big ass Time limit on it for a reason.
And you can't be taken serious at all if you say Cracker shitted on Luffy that's BS, Cracker had to hide behind a shit ton of clones just so he wouldn't get his ass curb stomped by Luffy, hell the mf got one shotted in the end. Once again, Oda put that time limit on this form for a reason. This was BM 3rd most powerful commander, showing that G4s attack power is too much for even a third strongest Yonko commander.
Sabo was the stronger one when they were kids that's it, with the logic your using Luffy will never surpass Sabo but we all know that's BS. Luffys growth rate is immense, the guy is going to be battling and most likely defeating guys Yonko Top commanders either this arc or next, that's not far or much beyond where Sabo is right now.
He also didn't have a better showing than Luffy did, you need to look at my other posts where I broke down how the fight played out.