- Joined
- Jun 5, 2013
- Messages
- 4,657
- Reaction score
- 247
It means absolutely nothing when the world's strongest man is going all out in a war and is pissed off and is fighting against three of the world's strongest fighters and neglects to name a single attack. If Luffy does a random kick with Gear 2 and doesn't give it a name, it's not gonna be weaker than if he gives a kick with a name. "Oh I'm speaking while delivering this attack, so it's stronger than that one I put the same effort in while in the same mode with the same body part but I DID speak while doing it."
Did you not read my post...some characters don't name their attacks the ones that do generally name their stronger attacks. Luffy hardly ever throws an unnamed attack so what I do know is if he ever does, than that attack must be garbage since even his weakest attacks are named, or its just a sign of disrespect. Named attacks signify training/practice/experience with an attack, thus they tend to be stronger.
For example when Kuzan froze Doflamingo he didn't say a word, its generally agreed that was one of his weakest freeze jobs where he went for speed over quality.
When Zoro sent that little tickle of a cut on Monet did he name it? No because it was trash, his second cut was a legitimate attack. So point stands characters who name pretty much all their attacks when they don't name one its usually trash or a sign of
You must be registered for see links
.