[Discussion] Ron Paul-Why is he not president!

[Huang]

This is disgusting how--I'm over viewing a lot of Ron Paul videos and my opinion is that he should have been president. He is the most honest candidate to date..! Mitt Romney practical bough t his own candidacy..Gary Johnson was losing to Ron then switched to Libertarian Party and won the nomination there.
Smh how is Ron Paul not president? Are people really so ignorant? Ignorance isn't bliss when it comes to the future of american.

Spoiler

[video=youtube_share;LmUa4sPIT1Y]http://youtu.be/LmUa4sPIT1Y[/video]

"Why isn't Ron Paul the President of the United State?"
"cause 3/4 of the american population are living in an imaginary world."
"I've decided I really like that he's not the best public speaker. I like how he has those slight little stutters. It makes him seem so much more honest. He's not just putting filler into his answers, he's answering."

The man wanted to go back to the Gold-Standart,.. Not one country in the world has interrest in gold anymore.
He would've backrupted your entire country in a heartbeat.

 

[James Harrsion]

The man wanted to go back to the Gold-Standart,.. Not one country in the world has interrest in gold anymore.
He would've backrupted your entire country in a heartbeat.

Oh. Double Posting is bad. Gold-Standart where did you get that? I only ask because all Social media is out to make Ron look like a idiot .

 

[SilverSlick]

The man wanted to go back to the Gold-Standart,.. Not one country in the world has interrest in gold anymore.
He would've backrupted your entire country in a heartbeat.

The U.S is already bankrupt

You must be registered for see links

Peter Schiff, the greatest economist of our time.

 

[Swizzik]

Lol the Gold standard...Only thing I couldn't get behind on Ron Paul.

 

[James Harrsion]

Lol can someone post a video to him saying we're going back to the Gold standard..lol..?

 

[Shinobi Train]

Ron Paul isn't president because he isn't corrupt. Obama is obviously far more corrupt than Romney...look who's president. Which means, Romney would have been a better president, but couldn't get the job because he isn't as evil as Obama...simple math here, guys. xd

 

[James Harrsion]

Ron Paul isn't president because he isn't corrupt. Obama is obviously far more corrupt than Romney...look who's president. Which means, Romney would have been a better president, but couldn't get the job because he isn't as evil as Obama...simple math here, guys. xd

I don't think you realize how much sense you just made.

 

[YowYan]

The man wanted to go back to the Gold-Standart,.. Not one country in the world has interrest in gold anymore.
He would've backrupted your entire country in a heartbeat.

You sure about that? You know the federal reserve is desperately trying to buy up gold reserves?
Also, the late dictator of Libya called Qadhafi Muamar (or som) wanted to implement a golden standard in all of africa uniting the negro and arabic nations. If that would happen, USA's worthless paper dollars would mean a huge collapse in either financial and power structure. That's why the CIA killed him.

 

[GEIxBattleRifle]

Ron Paul was a BETTER CANDIDATE than Romney.

Romney won the nomination with money no brains at all

 

[Dantee]

Well I voted Cheif Keef for president.

 

[Swizzik]

Honestly anyone saying that paper money is useless therefore melted rocks must be better doesn't make much sense to me.

 

[Ultimate uzumaki form]

You sure about that? You know the federal reserve is desperately trying to buy up gold reserves?
Also, the late dictator of Libya called Qadhafi Muamar (or som) wanted to implement a golden standard in all of africa uniting the negro and arabic nations. If that would happen, USA's worthless paper dollars would mean a huge collapse in either financial and power structure. That's why the CIA killed him.

Pretty much hit it on the spot yet, and I have yet to get that video of ron paul supporting gold standard

 

[ImmaculateShadow]

I agree that Ron Paul is honest but his ideas are horribly flawed.

† Gold Standard †
RP would have us believe that the gold standard would save our economic system buy banking off of a physically real product - in this case gold. However the gold standard has nothing to do with the America's past economic success, but instead the real cause was a shortage of workers. That's right, all through out Americas History until about the 50's America was desperate for workers. What this meant was that employers had to compete for employees resulting in a higher rate of pay!

Since then we've gained, in America, a surplus of workers - which means we have not enough jobs to give to all the eligible people in the country. Thus the gold standard will do nothing. Some thing else must happen.

Unfortunately all of his gimmick like election points are like this - shiny but all together fruitless.

 

[Ultimate uzumaki form]

Shadow----What do you think about China...they have a spectacular amount of people and yet they own most of our debt romney isn't wrong about shifting some jobs there for us americans

 

[ImmaculateShadow]

Shadow----What do you think about China...they have a spectacular amount of people and yet they own most of our debt romney isn't wrong about shifting some jobs there for us americans

Well, china's economy and government is based off of a State-Run Socialist model, which is what creates all those jobs for people. They have resources and cheep labor and so the Chines people get manufacturing & sequestering jobs that are essentially forced on - handed - to the people. Depending on which foreign corporation is shipping their jobs too China determines just how well the workers get paid & their treatment. For instance Apple workers are treated among the best yet there are plenty of jobs in China which can rightfully be called prison or slave labor.

Now don't get me wrong - I'm a socialist - but socialism means that those who work in the place of business/production own that place business/production and is nothing like state-run socialism. Thats when the state owns every thing so as to keep it safe for the people to HAVE a job. Thus resulting in forced labor, corporate run takeover of the public & enslavement to the state in the name of nationalism.

This "cheep labor" is why they own us in the sense of debt. We're being out worked by people who earn nothing. Get it?

So yes Romney is wrong - along with every one else who wishes to send jobs over seas. So why would they do it? Because it makes business sense. More product with cheeper labor costs? What do you think "free trade" really means? Well, I'll give you a hint. It doesn't have any thing to do with helping the masses live better and fuller lives.

The solution? Become as self sufficient as humanly possible. Educate yourself. Help every one you love and care for do the same. Only then will the tyrannical hold of corporation be broken.

 

[Ultimate uzumaki form]

Well, china's economy and government is based off of a State-Run Socialist model, which is what creates all those jobs for people. They have resources and cheep labor and so the Chines people get manufacturing & sequestering jobs that are essentially forced on - handed - to the people. Depending on which foreign corporation is shipping their jobs too China determines just how well the workers get paid & their treatment. For instance Apple workers are treated among the best yet there are plenty of jobs in China which can rightfully be called prison or slave labor.

Now don't get me wrong - I'm a socialist - but socialism means that those who work in the place of business/production own that place business/production and is nothing like state-run socialism. Thats when the state owns every thing so as to keep it safe for the people to HAVE a job. Thus resulting in forced labor, corporate run takeover of the public & enslavement to the state in the name of nationalism.

This "cheep labor" is why they own us in the sense of debt. We're being out worked by people who earn nothing. Get it?

So yes Romney is wrong - along with every one else who wishes to send jobs over seas. So why would they do it? Because it makes business sense. More product with cheeper labor costs? What do you think "free trade" really means? Well, I'll give you a hint. It doesn't have any thing to do with helping the masses live better and fuller lives.

The solution? Become as self sufficient as humanly possible. Educate yourself. Help every one you love and care for do the same. Only then will the tyrannical hold of corporation be broken.

Oh...I see. What do you think about 9/11?

 

[YowYan]

Well, china's economy and government is based off of a State-Run Socialist model, which is what creates all those jobs for people. They have resources and cheep labor and so the Chines people get manufacturing & sequestering jobs that are essentially forced on - handed - to the people. Depending on which foreign corporation is shipping their jobs too China determines just how well the workers get paid & their treatment. For instance Apple workers are treated among the best yet there are plenty of jobs in China which can rightfully be called prison or slave labor.

Now don't get me wrong - I'm a socialist - but socialism means that those who work in the place of business/production own that place business/production and is nothing like state-run socialism. Thats when the state owns every thing so as to keep it safe for the people to HAVE a job. Thus resulting in forced labor, corporate run takeover of the public & enslavement to the state in the name of nationalism.

This "cheep labor" is why they own us in the sense of debt. We're being out worked by people who earn nothing. Get it?

So yes Romney is wrong - along with every one else who wishes to send jobs over seas. So why would they do it? Because it makes business sense. More product with cheeper labor costs? What do you think "free trade" really means? Well, I'll give you a hint. It doesn't have any thing to do with helping the masses live better and fuller lives.

The solution? Become as self sufficient as humanly possible. Educate yourself. Help every one you love and care for do the same. Only then will the tyrannical hold of corporation be broken.

0.0 I agree with all but the fact that you said 'Apple workers are treated among the best'. I have an article here in which a journalist for a major news source went undercover in the Apple iPhone 5 production.. The circumstances where horrible! They even had suicide nets outside the building to catch suicidal emplyees!! let me look up that article edit: here's 1:

You must be registered for see links

 

[~WastelandSociety~]

Cause this happened:



Romney supporters rigging the poll.


Plus other people believe republicans are racist,etc.

I guess both democrat and republicans want 4 more years of high debt,lies,war,killing of innocent people with drones, signing things like NDAA,etc.

 

[ImmaculateShadow]

Oh...I see. What do you think about 9/11?

To be honest ... I don't know. I honestly don't know.

Part of the conundrum with 9/11 is that it rocked the western world when in point of fact that kind of thing happens all the time every where else in the world. Maybe it's isn't plains crashing in to buildings but genocide, black operations & drone killings are all things that the US has their hands in. This means that it was the western worlds "paradigm" that was rocked, not our physical lives. Though never underestimate the power of a strong delusion - the US needed to wake up, that much is sure, thought 9/11 was the worst kind of way to do it. Because of the backlash.

Was it faked? Well, entrapment seems to be a word that is being used a lot when I hear about US security officials supplying plans, money & equipment to potential terrorists in order to catch said terrorists now a days. Could this have been the case with 9/11 but gone wrong? Sure.

Though I just can't think that a botched black ops. "set up and capture" mission is more likely than 9/11 simply being the one time major plans just happen to go the way a hand full of death hungry extremists wanted it to go. Was it merely a matter of time? Probably. One thing I will say however - we don't know the whole story and it's more likely - by my count - that the men responsible had bigger plans that DID follow through than not.

AKA - explosives in the basement. Yes, moderately educated people can in fact make explosives.

0.0 I agree with all but the fact that you said 'Apple workers are treated among the best'. I have an article here in which a journalist for a major news source went undercover in the Apple iPhone 5 production.. The circumstances where horrible! They even had suicide nets outside the building to catch suicidal emplyees!! let me look up that article edit: here's 1:

You must be registered for see links

First you have to know is that the artical "exposing" Apple sensation that appeared in the NYT [

You must be registered for see links

] was 75% made the flay up. There was a huge interview with the author of the report before and after this was discovered on American Public Radio.

What I'm trying to say is that while working conditions are horrible Apple's Foxconn is the best of them - to be honest, that's not saying much.

Thank you for the article though, half way through it.

 

[YowYan]

To be honest ... I don't know. I honestly don't know.

Part of the conundrum with 9/11 is that it rocked the western world when in point of fact that kind of thing happens all the time every where else in the world. Maybe it's isn't plains crashing in to buildings but genocide, black operations & drone killings are all things that the US has their hands in. This means that it was the western worlds "paradigm" that was rocked, not our physical lives. Though never underestimate the power of a strong delusion - the US needed to wake up, that much is sure, thought 9/11 was the worst kind of way to do it. Because of the backlash.

Was it faked? Well, entrapment seems to be a word that is being used a lot when I hear about US security officials supplying plans, money & equipment to potential terrorists in order to catch said terrorists now a days. Could this have been the case with 9/11 but gone wrong? Sure.

Though I just can't think that a botched black ops. "set up and capture" mission is more likely than 9/11 simply being the one time major plans just happen to go the way a hand full of death hungry extremists wanted it to go. Was it merely a matter of time? Probably. One thing I will say however - we don't know the whole story and it's more likely - by my count - that the men responsible had bigger plans that DID follow through than not.

AKA - explosives in the basement. Yes, moderately educated people can in fact make explosives.


First you have to know is that the artical "exposing" Apple sensation that appeared in the NYT [

You must be registered for see links

] was 75% made the flay up. There was a huge interview with the author of the report before and after this was discovered on American Public Radio.

What I'm trying to say is that while working conditions are horrible Apple's Foxconn is the best of them - to be honest, that's not saying much.

Thank you for the article though, half way through it.

I see, I see, thanks bud! But I have this in the back of my mind that the media might have been trying to desperately dismiss this accusement to save FOXCONN's reputation. But who knows, I guess going by just an article is still speculation.