Not that again. The moment I saw the book 'Chariot of the Gods' I already knew how late it was. That book is from what? The Sixties? And based on the voice of that woman, that vid was recorded quite a long time ago too. Considering science, and other fields of research like history, have evolved since then at an astonishing rate, it's very doubtful that a lot of the things actually still stand (for so far they ever did stand).
On top of that you can clearly notice that the woman is extremely biased. The way she's talking it's almost like that everything she says already has been proven, but in the end what all those authors do is simply interpreting everything they see and hear the way it fits their ridiculous theory the best and act like it's logical. With other words they are biased people. They believe what they say is right and then start searching for things that prove it, but the result is that they see things that have no relation whatsoever with what they say as something that proves them right.
The amount of information and remains of the human history that have survived is pathetically little, especially the further you go back in time. If you would compare it to a puzzle, the human history would consist of something like a 100 000 pieces and we would barely have few hundred pieces left that are all spread. And then they can make some kind of universal history that links everything together based on that? The reason as why most academic people, or any person with a rational mind for that matter, finds this utter BS is not in the first place because the idea sounds stupid, but simply the way how those people came to that conclusion is just laughable. If any scientist or historian would work the same way those people did, then the human race would be doomed.
For instance they interpret all those myths and stories almost literally an act like there is only one, universal version of each myth and that it has always been like that. That's simply wrong. They disregard the enormous complexity of how myths, legends and stories have evolved, edited and passed down. Most people when they were young should hae played the game where you whisper something in the ear of another person who then whispers it in the ear of the next person and then laugh when the last person tells what's left of the story, which barely resembles what was originally said. It's the same principle, only a thousand times more worse and then they act like it's as clear as day.
You can see clearly how biased that woman is when she said as how 'complex' Stonehenge is. Stonehenge is a bunch of square rocks they just stuck into the ground. It's not complex at all, at least not in the way she makes it out to be. The reason as why Stonehenge is so special is because of the amount of people that was needed to build it, which indicates that there was an organized society that cut those blocks out of the rocks, transported them over long distances and then worked together to build the structure. In that era that was unprecedented. But the structure itself isn't that complex, those are just stones for which they dug holes into the ground and then just placed the stones in there. Do you know how the blocks on top were kept in place? They just made two holes in it, while the pillars had two protrusions at the top so that they would fit in the holes, nothing else. Yes that required some technical ingenuity to get that rock at the top, but if you have enough people, that isn't a big issue.
So then you're telling me that an alien race that can travel through warping holes, at the speed of light or bring their entire civilization with them like in Independence Day (no matter which scenario you choose, it means that they are extremely advanced), but the best they can do is making a bunch of stones standing up? That's one pathetic alien race.
That's the problem with all that crap. They simply disregard the most basic of notions. If you start using your common sense you can find that it's full of holes, you don't even need to have an academic background for that. In the end they say that we humans were too stupid to make things like the pyramids or Stonehenge, so we were visited by aliens that did it for us...The idea that humans were capable of making such things by themselves is ridiculous, but that aliens would have done it not ~_~
Also I find the scenario that would start reproducing with something they themselves made quite stupid, unless the humans they made were so gorgeous, but I find that script more fitting for a porn flick (It's alive!!!!!!! <.< >.> *unzips*) =/ Under normal circumstances you're not really going to have some fun with your experiments.
