His name wasnt Uzumaki at birth. If a tribe/clan undergoes namechange, it remains the same tribe/clan blood wise, just under a different name. The sage his birth name wasnt Uzumaki, but he can have renamed his tribe into the Uzumaki clan.
But why? What reason would there be to change the name? If the name changed so far down the line after mingling with other bloodlines, is it truly the same clan? I think not.
Clearly the Ootsutsuki didn't have large chakra pools, and nothing indicates strong life forces or sealing techniques. So even if they did the Ootsutsuki and the Uzumaki are very different people.
Rikudou's direct descendants were the Uchihas and Senjus only because the Apical ancestor of the Elder and Younger Sons was him, the Shinobi-Era Uzumaki Clan descended not from Rikudou but from his Kinsmen who were the progenitor Uzumakis, thus making them distant blood relatives of his children's clans: the Uchihas and Senjus. The other clans like the Hyuugas,Aburames,Akimichis,etc. descended from the pre-ninjutsu families that lived during Rikudou's Era, not from his bloodline, Hagoromo was no "Adam" sir, not all Shinobis descended from him. Lol
Masterful use of redirection to blur the subject at hand. However it's quite clear you didn't counter my point that your logic is faulty. You can't say the Elder son's descendants became the Uchiha so the Elder Son is an Uchiha. That just isn't a true statement.
Also if you think some how every single person born from the bloodline of the Sage's sons', across who knows how many generations, somehow all wound up in just 2 clans... well... you're just not using deductive reasoning. If direct descendants exist, it is only logical to conclude indirect descendants also existed.
Last edited:

