pooping on bernie's economic platform

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls πŸ“œ
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
I will list how bernie sanders plans to fix income inequality vs how those policies have proven to work in reality

"Increasing the federal minimum wage from $7.25 to $15 an hour by 2020. In the year 2015, no one who works 40 hours a week should be living in poverty".



Bernie says he plans to raise the minimum wage because no one who works 40 hours a week should be in poverty.

As thomas sowell proves above raising the minimum wage hurts young and unskilled workers by making those jobs viable options for older more skilled workers to come down and take.

He also mentions the effect on black teenage unemployment.

in 1949 black teenage unemployment was 9%(minimum wage was the equivalent of $4.04 an hour today)

Since the 1960's minimum wage has increased steadily as has black teenage unemployment. it was 27% in the 60's and hasn't been under 40 percent since the early 80's.

later on in bernie's platform he goes on to say this

"Creating 1 million jobs for disadvantaged young Americans by investing $5.5 billion in a youth jobs program. Today, the youth unemployment rate is off the charts. We have got to end this tragedy by making sure teenagers and young adults have the jobs they need to move up the economic ladder."

Does he not look at the effects of these policies? Or just incredibly ignorant and stubborn?

He wants to simultaneously hurt the youth of America but invest more tax payer dollars to fix a problem he is making worse. This is your genius savior?

"Fighting for pay equity by signing the Paycheck Fairness Act into law. It is an outrage that women earn just 78 cents for every dollar a man earns."


This has been proven false numerous times, now women get an unfair boost due to the careers they choose to pursue? I thought he was for equality, not anti male bias.

Americans are taxed at 40% now

He intends to add Free healthcare
"Guaranteeing healthcare as a right of citizenship by enacting a Medicare for all single-payer healthcare system. It’s time for the U.S. to join every major industrialized country on earth and provide universal healthcare to all."

Free college

"Making tuition free at public colleges and universities throughout America. Everyone in this country who studies hard should be able to go to college regardless of income"

subsidized Pre-school

"Enacting a universal childcare and prekindergarten program. Every psychologist understands that the most formative years for a human being is from the ages 0-3. We have got to make sure every family in America has the opportunity to send their kids to a high quality childcare and pre-K program."

If you support bernie sanders what do you think is a reasonable percent that the american people should have taken from their checks to make all this happen? 40% from everyone isn't enough, and taking exponentially from the rich sounds good but is take out on the workers always. An example of this is when Obama mandated that all fast food employees that work over 30 hrs a week be given insurance. All that restaurants did was cut the workers back to 29 hrs. a week.

Biting the hand that feeds never works out well for the little guy
 

SoundBar

Leaf Village Regular πŸƒ
Regular
Joined
Dec 30, 2011
Messages
733
Reaction score
59
Although I agree this will never in a million years work without horrible repercussions, you did a terrible job at finding its weak points.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls πŸ“œ
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Although I agree this will never in a million years work without horrible repercussions, you did a terrible job at finding its weak points.

kinda lost interest halfway into making this and half assed it
 

ChicagoJhawk

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Jul 1, 2015
Messages
4,577
Reaction score
422
It's not like we have good choice here people. The next election is literally gonna be a decision on which piece of turd is less disgusting than the others
 

Multiply

Kage in the Making πŸ‘‘
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Reaction score
1,034
Oh god, I read the first few lines until you mentioned Thomas Sowell. You're still on with your bullshit huh.
 

Lightbringer

Kage in the Making πŸ‘‘
Legendary
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
14,168
Reaction score
1,484
Oh god just stop. You're not a politician or an economist.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls πŸ“œ
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Oh god just stop. You're not a politician or an economist.
By all means come with some facts. And I study economics all the time, so i'm probably better informed than you.
Oh god, I read the first few lines until you mentioned Thomas Sowell. You're still on with your bullshit huh.

Sowell uses facts. Your problem is that I had too many facts
 

Lightbringer

Kage in the Making πŸ‘‘
Legendary
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
14,168
Reaction score
1,484
By all means come with some facts. And I study economics all the time, so i'm probably better informed than you.

Not by what I read. Bernie Sanders has used the EU as a model for his ideas who have successfully implemented those policies. Just look at Sweden, who's ranked higher than the U.S. in GDP.

So that's all the fact that's needed because it's already happened in other countries, which makes his policies possible and you're thesis wrong.
 

Multiply

Kage in the Making πŸ‘‘
Legendary
Joined
Apr 15, 2012
Messages
12,839
Reaction score
1,034
Sowell uses facts. Your problem is that I had too many facts

My problem is that you never fail to cup Thomas Sowell's nut sack with your e-hands.

I didn't say you were wrong or right. I said I didn't read it because I can just 'sense' the regurgitation.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls πŸ“œ
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Not by what I read. Bernie Sanders has used the EU as a model for his ideas who have successfully implemented those policies. Just look at Sweden, who's ranked higher than the U.S. in GDP.

So that's all the fact that's needed because it's already happened in other countries, which makes his policies possible and you're thesis wrong.

 

Lightbringer

Kage in the Making πŸ‘‘
Legendary
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
14,168
Reaction score
1,484

Wow, when in doubt, use an unreliable source. I've been to Sweden so I've seen it first hand. Even the first comment on your link who's a resident of Sweden disagrees with it. lol
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls πŸ“œ
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Wow, when in doubt use an unreliable source. I've been to Sweden so I've seen it first hand, even the first comment on your link disagrees with it.

when in doubt choose to be blind. bernie sanders says he is for the little man but in the nordic countries they employ a higher personal tax than here and a lower tax on businesses compared to current america. tell me how that fits with fighting for the little man
 
Last edited:

Lightbringer

Kage in the Making πŸ‘‘
Legendary
Joined
Feb 9, 2012
Messages
14,168
Reaction score
1,484
when in doubt choose to be blind. bernie sanders says he is for the little man but int eh nordic countries they employ a higher personal tax than here and a lower tax on businesses compared to current america. tell me how that fits with fighting for the little man

Or how about we look at the statistics.

-Sweden's GDP is higher than the U.S.

-Sweden's wealth gap is less severe than the U.S. meaning the poor, the middle class, and the rich are relatively close in wealth which is ideal. The difference in wealth with the poor and rich within the U.S. is substantially, inequitably, and unequivocally different.

-Free college

-Standard of living is higher.


As for your tax rebuttal. There was a poll in Sweden which the majority voted that they were content with the taxes and felt that it was done fairly.
 

slimreaper

Sannin of the Scrolls πŸ“œ
Elite
Joined
Aug 1, 2012
Messages
8,416
Reaction score
499
Or how about we look at the statistics.

-Sweden's GDP is higher than the U.S.

-Sweden's wealth gap is less severe than the U.S. meaning the poor, the middle class, and the rich are relatively close in wealth which is ideal. The difference in wealth with the poor and rich within the U.S. is substantially, inequitably, and unequivocally different.

-Free college

-Standard of living is higher.


As for your tax rebuttal. There was a poll in Sweden which the majority voted that they were content with the taxes and felt that it was done fairly.

US. GDP 16.8 trillion, 1.9% growth,1.2% 5 year growth
Sweden. GDP 396 billion, 1.5% growth, 1.3 % 5 year growth


US rank in economic freedom 12, sweden 23

at the end of the day we have expenses that sweden doesn't have and will never have with a population of 9 million(less than North Carolina)

As far as income inequality making everyone poor won't help that.
 
Last edited:
Top