You know this is now the second time the past few weeks that you make a wall of a theory where you succeed in rendering the entire theory mute from your very first sentences. The person who writes a theory is the one who should the most critical about it. The person who writes a theory should the last one to be convinced about it. This is to ensure the objectivity of a theory as much as possible as all theories are subjective, but you can reduce that to a minimum.
And what did you say? That people will be left convinced. With other words you are already convinced that this being proven is nothing more than a formality, so you just admitted that you interpreted all of your arguments so that they would fit your theory. You first set a goal that you wanted to achieve and then consequently started interpreting everything so it would fit that goal. Despite all your glamouring about how much time you spent 'investigating', it was all for naught as biased research is pointless. It goes against the entire point of doing research in the first place. You just researched stuff while believing what you say is already true, you just needed to find more back-up for that and as a result you started seeing everything that could be interpreted as 'proof', as proof ignoring the fact that in many cases they can be easily interpreted in hundreds of different ways. You're supposed to do it the other way around.
You broke one of the most fundamental rules of making theories and if you do that, your theories are worthless as they are not even theories anymore. This is not a theory. You are picking on Sabo fans, but in the end you did exactly the same. You want this to be true and try to deny vehemently the humongous flaws it has and as a result everything you just said has become mute. It holds no value. You're no different right now than a conservative theist holding up a holy book and saying "if you read this book, you will be convinced of the true god, it's irrevocable". You are not particularly good at making theories, you are just good at fooling people and masking that your theories are in reality full of holes. You are pretty much misleading people, this has more in common with a OP fanfiction than a OP theory.
This becomes even more obvious all the way at the beginning were you said that you made an earlier almost irrevocable theory. Again the fact that you said that, makes your entire theory mute as the objectivity of all your arguments has been rendered false and if that theory was similar to this one and the previous one I read, it was no doubt likewise full of holes. More importantly the fact that your theory was proven not to be true despite you claiming it was irrevocable and then consequently tried to salvage the theory in this thread, proves that first formulate the end result you want to achieve with your result and then start researching. In the end you just want Coby to eat the fruit and as a result you frantically started searching things that could be interpreted in favor of that. What you listed here are not so much arguments proving your theory as they are excuses for yourself to avoid facing the reality that you were completely off the mark.
Seriously there are even several times you use your own theory as an argument to prove your own theory. You are reasoning in circles. Half of the time you are even trying to edit the story so that it fits your theory, it's supposed to be the complete opposite, you are supposed to edit your theory so that it fits the story. If that's not possible, it means your theory is flawed.
I'm really not going to bother again to point all the flaws and holes there are in this theory of yours. Then I'm still writing tomorrow and it's useless as you do not listen to them either way. These remarks at the bottom of your post pretty much translate as "if you do not agree with my theory, do not post here as I only want people to say it's good and certainly do not dare to point out the many holes in it". I will however make a few remarks.
The time skip only happened not even two weeks ago in the series. They have been like 2-3 days on Fishman Island, 2-3 days on Punk Hazard, 2-3 days on Dressrosa and the travel between those islands also didn't last long. We know that the Reverie is close at hand as Vivi was even preparing for it the moment the Strawhats still were on FI. A few weeks in the future, at best a few months. And then you say there's going to be another time-skip almost directly after the first, rendering the first mute. This makes absolutely no sense, you do not need to do any research for that, you only need to be able to read and understand One Piece. But you need it for your theory to work =/ You want Coby to eat the MMnM, but it just has been eaten by Sabo. So Sabo has to die. He was introduced only after Ace died. He was assumed to already be dead. Then appears to be alive, he eats the fruit, Oda doesn't like to kill characters and what is going to happen according to you? He is going to die because otherwise Coby can't eat it. So Oda introduces a 2nd brother of Luffy which he makes him appear to be dead for the longest time, then shows he is still alive, then immediately kills him...what was the point of his character then? And why bothering letting him eat the MMnM if he wanted Coby to have it? If that was his intention, he could have let Coby come with Fujitora to Dressrosa and let him eat it in the turmoil and then there was also never a point in creating Sabo in the first place if he is going to kill him not soon after. Because we didn't know much of Sabo yet, he also was ideal to let him eat a DF easily. Coby on the other hand has had no DF since chapter 2 and he always did fine without it. He is already a marine captain, the same position Smoker had at the start of the series, he has awakened his haki and he is being trained by an expert fighter who never had a DF himself. There is no reason to assume he needs one, but because you want him to have one, you write all of this. You are mutilating the entire story just so that it fits your supposed theory. The world is upside down here. This is an alternative OPvers. You have got the genuine series of Oda and then you have got yours. You claim to be using logical reasoning, start using it then.
A dragon claw and crab pincer are not the same thing.
There is very well a difference between a dog trying to bite through a crab's shell and throwing it away and Shanks blocking what would have been certain death for Coby. Shanks is Coby's shell? I mean what the hell?
And yes Oda uses many patterns, but you do not know where exactly they begin and end. Neither Zephyr nor Sengoku had any nickname of an animal and a color nor Garp for that matter, might as well involve him too. All three of them had nicknames based on their physical attributes. "Garp the Fist". "Black-Arm Zephyr". "Sengoku the Buddha". Despite that the time skip and the War of the Best was meant to bridge a generation, the reality is that Akainu, Fujitora and Kizaru are much older than Luffy. Coby on the other hand is almost the same age as Luffy. A possibility might very well be that the pattern Oda follows is that he finds new nicknames for every generation and that Coby's generation will get different names than that of Akainu. Akainu was already a vice admiral when Luffy even had yet to be born. The original Shichibukai also all had an animal theme. However that did not apply to Blackbeard, Buggy nor Law. So there is hell of a lot of liberty with all these patterns, but you ignore them, only see the things that are interesting for you.
Kizaru is in petite panel on a page? So is Bepo. Now tell me what does the story of Momotaro tell about polar bears? I mean there was a bear on the panel right besides the yellow monkey. That must mean something right? As after all according to you OP is nothing more than recycled version of the story of Momotaro.
And this list goes on and on and on. You want to make people believe that this theory is like a perfectly straight road and that you can clearly see at the end that there is no doubt that Coby is going to eat the MMnM. It's as clear a day apparently. You are just pulling wool over their eyes as the reality is that there are hundred twisted roads to the left, right, above an below into all directions. It's a maze, that's the reality and you have been so sucked up in those theories of yours you seem to have lost all touch with the real story.
But no doubt you are just going brush this all again under the table. You are picking on Sabo fans saying that they will not like it, but in reality you like it even less to face the reality that all of this is pretty much baseless bogus. You can throw around all week hundreds of these biased arguments, but it will never change the fact that your entire theory is based on loose sand that will crumble each time. In the case you somehow would have gotten something wright, it had more to do with luck than logical reasoning or research.
