OG Spiderman vs The amazing spiderman
- Thread starter Nundo
- Start date
The main thing I don't like in the Amazing Spider-Man is the storyline and that will not gonna change . Electro is good villain but still thiss cannot make me to say that the amazing spider is better . I will not like it and TOG Spder-Man will always be better for me . These are just opnions you like it I don't that is all .
Jazzy Stardust
Banned
Awards
The Amazing Spiderman is a lot better and follows the comics better. I also didn't like Toby McGuire as Spider-Man, it was odd.
kuramasage
Member
I'm tied on who's better between Maguire and Garfield. The 1st 2 Raimi films were great, but Spider-Man 3 was very bad. Similarly, the 1st Amazing film was crap, the worst of them all, but the sequel was brilliant, the bets Spidey film yet. So, I'm undecided. :Omg:
~Naruto&Itachi~
Active member
Awards
I like the amazing but I don't like how he uses that machine to shoot web....but I like his personality
Jack Spicer
Active member
Awards
MuerteMiAmigo
Active member
JStar King
Active member
Awards
I like them both. Hollywood is running out of ideas which is why they are remaking movies as soon as they are done. Just imagine what they're gonna do with Twilight. It'll be torture!
You must be registered for see images
The Mockingjay
Active member
I'm the biggest MArvel comic nerd you'll find. Personally, I thought the original spiderman was aerage at best... 3 being one of my least favourite comic book movies ever.
I haven't seen Amazig 2 yet. But Amazing is easily my preferred of the series
I haven't seen Amazig 2 yet. But Amazing is easily my preferred of the series
Jazzy Stardust
Banned
Awards
Well that wasn't the case with the Spider-Man series. The writer of the original Spider-Man had a movie contract with sony to do the movies, he was suppose to do more but he's terrible and couldn't think of were to take the series after the third movie. So he eventually decided to drop it. Then Stan Lee was concerned about were his character was going with Sony and decided to not give them the rights, and Columbia picked it up instead.
And now we have the new movies.
It's hard to say really, the original was made quite well. The CGI is just a little off now, but that's only because it's more than 10 years old. It was structured and produced very well (only downfall was the repetition of Mary Jane being captured and rescued in every part). Toby Maguire didn't really play Peter Parker 100% the way he is meant to be, but the layout of the films were good (excluding part 3).
The Amazing Spider-Man has average CGI, but better than the original, the story line is also closer to the original Spider-Man idea. The characters are pretty much equal, though Andrew Garfield plays Peter Parker better than TM. You get a better Peter Parker feel through AG's performance. Although you Willem Defoe, James Franco and J.K. Simmons performances from the original is just classic. Good thing about the remake is the nice modern feel through dialogue.
The original Spider-Man 1 was a good starting and developing part, the second was just brilliant and the third actually destroyed the series.
The reboot Spider-Man 1 is pretty much like the original, good starting point, the second also was very good a bit much going on, but good nonetheless.
The Amazing Spider-Man has average CGI, but better than the original, the story line is also closer to the original Spider-Man idea. The characters are pretty much equal, though Andrew Garfield plays Peter Parker better than TM. You get a better Peter Parker feel through AG's performance. Although you Willem Defoe, James Franco and J.K. Simmons performances from the original is just classic. Good thing about the remake is the nice modern feel through dialogue.
The original Spider-Man 1 was a good starting and developing part, the second was just brilliant and the third actually destroyed the series.
The reboot Spider-Man 1 is pretty much like the original, good starting point, the second also was very good a bit much going on, but good nonetheless.
