[Multi-Console] None of them compete.

Kettei

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Mar 13, 2012
Messages
10,732
Reaction score
674
I do not comprehend you can do so so sooooo much more on multiplier battlefield 3 then any Cod multiplier. Did you see the environment destruction?
Did you see the land/air/water battles?

It looks so much less restricting the CoD.

It's too realistic.No Quickscoping.Or Playing with friends.Literally no one from my school plays Battlefield.
 

Deadai

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Aug 19, 2011
Messages
11,528
Reaction score
1,077
It's too realistic.No Quickscoping.Or Playing with friends.Literally no one from my school plays Battlefield.

How is it being too realistic a negative...?
Just make friends online when playing that's what I do.
 

Hypemaster

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
9,686
Reaction score
937
It's too realistic.No Quickscoping.Or Playing with friends.Literally no one from my school plays Battlefield.

Lmao it's too realistic? Well I'm sorry maybe they should throw in some more cell-shade to your delight...
 

ReverseZero12

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
May 27, 2013
Messages
1,517
Reaction score
85
As far as which game has a better designed gameplay system, it's call of duty hands down. The problem with COD is the shitty community and in BO2's case, the lag and horrible hit detection. If you can get past that, it's one of the best FPS games for sure.
I heard BF3 was good but it's online is almost dead.
Killzone 3 is probably the best one I've tried out though overall but I haven't tried Medal of honour yet.
 

Jack Spicer

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 6, 2011
Messages
19,000
Reaction score
1,816
Why is it competition? Let people enjoy what they enjoy. Everyone has different tastes. It's all subjective, but one common thing. We all enjoy gaming in general, you know? It's about what's fun. People can say so and so is superior all they want, but that's just an opinion and an opinion will never be fact.
 
Top