Even if all this bull shit was true, why the **** would it matter? Friendly or not, or , whether or not he listened to rap music? Someones personality traits do not constitute a limitation or restriction of their basic human rights.
We don't know how it all went down. We weren't there and there were very few witnesses. However, all evidence points to Brown being unruly, noncompliant and using excessive force on the officer. There were even witnesses that had stories that matched the evidence for god sake. So how about the basic human rights for that officer? Is it that when you become an officer, you lose your self-defense rights? What if that was an innocent bystander with a permit to carry a weapon and Brown attacked them, is that alright now to open fire in self defense?
Officer or not, Wilson is still an American civilian and he has the same rights as we do. Evidence points to Wilson order Brown to put his hands up, get on the ground, to stop approaching, etc. Brown refused to do any of that and proceeded to assault the officer. Whether Brown actually went for the gun or not doesn't matter, he was attacking and Wilson had all the right to defend himself to which he used his gun. If you even take a look, multiple shots were fired, first 2 in Michaels arm to which didn't stop Michael from assaulting, forcing the 3rd shot to be somewhere more critical and life threatening. What the cop did was just, he had the right to detain Michael for violence and then had the right to defend himself, his own life after Michael directed that violence upon the officer.
Now here's what I find even more stupid about Ferguson and your counter-arguement. If you were fighting for the cause of racial diversity, for being suppressed by state officials, especially officers, you don't choose the thug who already has staggering evidence upon him that he was already a violent bully and showed signs of wanting to assault and even kill officers, whether good or corrupt, to be the face of your god damn movement. That's like using Kim-Jon Un as the face of equality in North and South Korea, it just doesn't make sense. Eric Garner, Tamir Rice, etc. are people that should be used as the face. They were shot and/or killed unjustly by officers overreacting and abusing their powers and authority, but noooo, let's destroy a god damn town for Michael Brown.
Why would it matter? If Michael Brown killed Wilson instead, would that be fair instead? Killing a cop for doing their job? Killing a cop that was trying to defend themselves? Would a riot be thrown in Wilson's stead? Look at the bigger picture you ignorant **** and you tell me that this riot, this destruction of other peoples property (in which they too have human rights) over a court ruling in favor of an officer who made the just call is the right way to approach this matter?! What if this riot resulted in the death of other innocent bystanders? Is this all Wilson's fault still?