- Joined
- Jul 2, 2014
- Messages
- 996
- Reaction score
- 64
That is a theory by Tobirama. Nothing more, nothing less. Given that UChihas didn't rebel for fifty plus long years, simply living on the side lines in a village they created. It's funny how you seem to avoid how psychotic Tobirama himself was, or his sympathizers. Hashirama chooses to build a village to safe guard children's rights, he follows it up with Chunin exams, where there is an option to slaughter other children to get those sparse Chunin seats. How nice, practical, kind-hearted and far-reaching of him. Not to mention the council he cobbled up to take the helm for decades, becoming the living corrupt relics of the past, where everything was justifiable, as long as Konoha didn't lose its perch on the top - slaughter of the original Akatsuki, orphans, massacring Ame's innocent population, crippling their economy just to name a few. So let's not unload on the Uchiha clan just because we feel like it.
How did he become corrupted? He had his own vision of peace. There is little corruption in that, or still less of it than these governmental shams that gave little voice to the people and aided and abetted criminals, carried out cross border terrorism, and let's not even touch the slaughter of a politically neutral village called Ame at their hands.
Just because one person loses it within a clan, you are going to stand the entire race with him? That's a pretty absurd and unrealistic look at things. There are different kinds of people in different races. Not everyone is a saint, but nor are all evil. You can never use one person to judge the entirety of a clan. That's idiotic.
Not really. You chose to interpret it that way. Show me a page where many say that Uchiha are evil other than Tobirama's c*ck-and-bull, self-serving tales.
Okay now we're talking about something different entirely. I was commenting on the line of progression for hokage and why the uchiha (esp, at that time) were unfit for it save a few, as I mentioned earlier. I'm in no way advocating for the moral ambiguity of the village itself.
But, to go over your points. First, I would say that an author usually places commentary into their characters as a way of displaying a truth of an issue. So, tobirama's exposition was meant to be an enlightening explanation as to why the uchiha have this history or as the manga calls it "curse" of hatred. IMO, it is meant to be taken as fact with a little bit of tobirama's own shading from his past experiences.
The government shams you refer to are basically danzo and the elders. I think you would be hard pressed to find someone who would argue that what those three were doing was morally right but that doesn't make the whole village corrupt anymore than, by your assertion, a few bad uchiha makes the whole uchiha corrupt. Right?