If you go to the Versus Colosseum, There a bunch of threads that go against what the original section should be about. I suggest we have a Sub-Section under the Versus Colosseum for people who want to debate to there heart's content, This way the section could be a little cleaner and not be piled with debates.
[Suggestion] NB Debate Sub-Section.
- Thread starter Kagerou
- Start date
- Status
Lol I'm guessing you're separating debating from a 'VS match'. What I'm saying is, they are essentially the same. One character against another, the only difference is that they're only two participants. I'm saying I don't think it's much of a different to justify a subsection. Furthermore, there's a tournament now, which means once it's over they will begin to slow down. It'll basically be consciously creating a dead section.
Cursed Prince
Active member
Lol, I'm talking about that Tournament or whatever, I'm just talking about a section for the versus threads like those gauntlets or whatever people make and a sub-section for the more high anticipated genre known as "Debates"
ShiningStar
Active member
I agree with Nameless up until the last point. Even after the tournament ends, there will still be people practising and creating more VS threads for the fun of it. And if we ever organise another one, not only will be VS threads in preparation for that, but even more coming in with the matches' own threads.
My main point is there's an existing section that fits the criteria; and it's more or less creating a duplicate section. I think that's the reasoning the mods/admins will see in your suggestion.
Nonetheless, good luck with your suggestion. I guess it won't hurt any of the frequent visitors/participants of that section.
I use to visit the section a lot, but I guess not enough anymore. It seems those threads appear more than I realized. Now that I think about it, the current tournament is what drew my recent attention. Haven't visited it much outside that.
Last edited:
It has been said before:-Members who want to debate exclusively should make a debate group and keep their debates within that group itself. There is not much point of such threads in main forums where other members can spam but cannot participate in serious discussions. It can be done in a more organized and neat way within the group.
Making a sub section in a sub forum for threads full of spam(random comments, chat , discussions about infractions and bans yada yada) with only a few genuine on topic posts, is a no go. I will be cleaning the debate section. Next time please hit the report button when threads are getting out of hand. Amount of spam in such debate threads is just too much.
Making a sub section in a sub forum for threads full of spam(random comments, chat , discussions about infractions and bans yada yada) with only a few genuine on topic posts, is a no go. I will be cleaning the debate section. Next time please hit the report button when threads are getting out of hand. Amount of spam in such debate threads is just too much.
Last edited:
Actually no are you are wrong and I of all people should know that considering I made that section. I hate VS threads, every fibre in my body despises them. However because people kept spamming them just for the heck of it, thinking that somehow they have to do it, I made the VS Threads section so that other people wouldn't be bothered by them anymore and the people who still wanted to make them, couldn't issue any complains as they have a sub-section only for them!
However these people didn't want to post there, so they thought they were going to be clever by having the naive and childish idea of just using other formulations instead of 'VS' like 'taking up the gauntlet', 'this character solos' etc.
So to burst these people's bubbles I made a more extensive section description, changed the name to make it more appealing and even added a prefix. Nonetheless the threads which belong there have always been exactly the same. No matter what kind of formulation you use, the contents of the thread still remains in the end the same.
- Status