Naruto Wiki

[XxLapizxLazulixX]

Often times, people will bash on Naruto wiki saying things like, "Its unreliable because it is written by fans." and that "ANYONE can edit it."

Well my thing is this, in debates on here, 95% of them are biased, trollish, or Fapboy VS Fanboy filled with insults. The 5% are actual ones who use reason (T Bogar..cough cough.)

So why is it that people say Naruto Wikia is unreliable as if the users on Narutobase are? No. At least on Naruto Wikia, the information is neutral. Nobody is posting to make a character or technique seem OP or seem useless. Most, if not all of it is accurate. I would say 95%, I have never been mislead whenever I wanted to look something up, whereas on here, Everyone has different opinions, and accoridng to everyone, they are ABSOLUTLEY without a doubt RIGHT about it. No, I say Naruto Wikia is more credible than trying to find out about anything naruto related on this forum except for new chapter releases. How can you say this forum is more credible when Naruto Wikia even has links to manga references and anime ones plus more and is made for all fans of all characters?

The logic we get is.

"Sasori is the fastest AERIAL ninja."
" Totsuka gg, Kamui gg, Sasuke speed blitz gg."
Im sorry, but with 95% of this going on, how can anyone say Naruto Wikia isnt credible? lol

 

[God of the akatsuki]

not everything on the wiki is true lol

#mangafacts

 

[Snape Uchiha]

I've never once seen Naruto Wiki be wrong or biased. It is a great site.

 

[XxLapizxLazulixX]

not everything on the wiki is true lol

#mangafacts

Most of what I see on here is untrue, fake, misconception, and twisted versions of the truth
#Basefact

 

[Maito Gai]

wiki is a good source but not wholly solid manga scans trump all

 

[XxLapizxLazulixX]

I've never once seen Naruto Wiki be wrong or biased. It is a great site.

Niether have i, but whenever I try to post in a debate, when logic is gone, I get, "You are using wikia, you lose." LMAO. Even though the page i linked is all factual with evidence.

 

[Flawž]

because in Naruti wiki, Sasuke was listed deceased the moment he got stabbed.

:|

hes not even dead yet.

 

[Fountain]

You said "Fapboy VS Fanboy". What's a Fapboy?

 

[XxLapizxLazulixX]

wiki is a good source but not wholly solid manga scans trump all

Even with Manga scans, people either twist the characters words, misunderstand the sound effects and/or imagry, or simply use old scans to compare with recent events.

 

[Allsymbolsparttwo]

obito is deceased in the wiki. THAT IS A LIE >:U

 

[Snape Uchiha]

because in Naruti wiki, Sasuke was listed deceased the moment he got stabbed.

:|

hes not even dead yet.

It says, "presumed deceased" And he is dead. So is Naruto. They will be resuscitated but now they are in a death state.

 

[God of the akatsuki]

because in Naruti wiki, Sasuke was listed deceased the moment he got stabbed.

:|

hes not even dead yet.

i know right and notice they said killer bee is incapacitated but I thought once the taild beast is extracted from them its game over thay are dead

 

[Flawž]

It says, "presumed deceased" And he is dead. So is Naruto. They will be resuscitated but now they are in a death state.

They are on the verge of death. naruto is being kept alive by sakura while sasuke is about to die any second.

 

[Punk Hazard]

Lots of the time, the wiki has links to manga pages that support what it says. It can be reliable if there's a citation, but some isn't true. The wiki is a quick way to get manga facts though.

 

[XxLapizxLazulixX]

because in Naruti wiki, Sasuke was listed deceased the moment he got stabbed.

:|

hes not even dead yet.

No it dosent..

Killerbee's fate is unknown as of yet. But logically thinking, he just had 8 tails ripped from him. He could be barely surviving off the tentacle that was cut.

And for Obito it says incompacitated.

 

[Punk Hazard]

i know right and notice they said killer bee is incapacitated but I thought once the taild beast is extracted from them its game over thay are dead

It says incapacitated because Bee hasn't shown to be dead. While it is very likely he is dead, until we actually see him not being alive, we can't just say he's dead. Putting incapacitated is more valid than deceased.

 

[Byron123]

Agree, I think that Naruto wiki can be a really useful site, can't get why people say it's unreliable (yet they don't even post a single examle of such inaccuracy.

 

[awesomeseimei]

Narutopedia has a pretty hardcore quality control and the regular editors are quite nerdy and very strict.

Just read talk pages and discussions there.

 

[Byron123]

obito is deceased in the wiki. THAT IS A LIE >:U

I don't waht you read but in narutopedia it says he's incapacitated.

 

[P3ĮÑ]

Precisely. You can virtually tell, narutobase debates aren't even reliable, the reason being most of the time the fanboys or any other individual will not propitiate anyone's argument it gets tied in a knot and NO ONE comes to an agreement, most of the time this is the case, so the use of no limit fallacy, ad hominem, circular reasoning and certain fallacy's are exploited, one of the most particular reason I quit going to NDS and the versus collosuem. Yet some claims are very aberrant, and don't seem feasible, no one is fixed on something, there is always some people who'll ascend out of nowhere and occlude the multiple claims sometimes with no reason. And think winning a debate means utmost everything. Compared to that shit, wikia is more reliable, well to an extent at least some of the information is faulty but it's a good way to collect manga scans and whatnot, but still better then what I see on NB. So what you said holds relevance and meaning.