[Predictions] Naruto Manga 435 Predictions / 434 Discussion
- Thread starter Versuvio
- Start date
- Status
NineTailedSage
Member
why? when a picture is worth a thousand words. but i think its 430 page 19. sorry cant post links yet.
NineTailedSage
Member
I was refering to the posible naruto spoiler being real. its not the first time i've seen it, but it was at least 2 years ago, i'm sure. just as sure as yodamine being a sage.
Xero, Im afraid I can't so readily dismiss this theory. There are many corrilations between Uchiha and tengu, and I don't think this was done on accident.
At any rate, the Tengu Theory is just that, a theory. You see, the thing is, just because a piece or two of the theory is proven wrong, to me, doesn't mean the thery is wrong. It just means it requires rethinking and perhaps bit of reworking. However, if the core of the message hasn't been disproven, in my mind, the theory itself hasn't been disproven.
Just like the Minato Sage theory. There are some factors that don't add up with this theory, however, there are some that do. Just because Fukusaku has never mentioned Minato doesn't mean he wasn't a sage, kind of a thing.
So until someone in the manga says Minato was or wasn't a sage, we don't know for sure and each side of the theory, both for and against, must update to support their argument.
This, for me, is the essence of theory creation. Update with the manga, roll with the punches, and include new information that supports your theory.
Until the maga itself has weighed in, every theory is open and livin, even if the breath it draws this week is araspy gasp, tommorow Chiyosama may grant it life.
At any rate, the Tengu Theory is just that, a theory. You see, the thing is, just because a piece or two of the theory is proven wrong, to me, doesn't mean the thery is wrong. It just means it requires rethinking and perhaps bit of reworking. However, if the core of the message hasn't been disproven, in my mind, the theory itself hasn't been disproven.
Just like the Minato Sage theory. There are some factors that don't add up with this theory, however, there are some that do. Just because Fukusaku has never mentioned Minato doesn't mean he wasn't a sage, kind of a thing.
So until someone in the manga says Minato was or wasn't a sage, we don't know for sure and each side of the theory, both for and against, must update to support their argument.
This, for me, is the essence of theory creation. Update with the manga, roll with the punches, and include new information that supports your theory.
Until the maga itself has weighed in, every theory is open and livin, even if the breath it draws this week is araspy gasp, tommorow Chiyosama may grant it life.
You must be registered for see links
vivekroongta
Member
I don't know how quoting you will show up, so anybody's who's lost by my replys, just follow the trail back. *Certainly, I agree. *Good story. I don't know what I can believe about it, since I'm no history buff. I can wait until it's revealed. *"Hypothesises" shows as correct on my browser spell check. *I think it's gotta be worthwhile since Kishi purposefully stayed away from showing it when he was with Sasuke and when he revealed himself to Kisame. *I didn't realize anybody realized any connection with the necklace of the Sage of 6 paths and the Sharingan. Other than you, who thought of this? I'm not calling you out. I'm just wondering why you'd say that.If he was 18? Minato came illegitimately? ... Factual based assumptions or not? lol
I agree. But his name was certainly on the contract. No doubt about that!
An extremely old, completely wild theory. It even goes so far as to invent totally new key characters...
No plural for hypothesis, I think. It's not that we haven't seen his left eye, it's that was haven't seen his entire face. I believe that we'd be all WTF if we saw his entire face. If we saw just the pupil of his left eye, I doubt we'd learn anything worthwhile. (I think it's Salamander Hanzo's face btw O_O) Anybody? Yes, nearly everybody!
platinum69
Active member
- Status