Naruto animators must take note from AOT
- Thread starter esenn1
- Start date
Loki Helcast
Member
wanna know the real reason?
studio pierrot is self managing,so they use their money,to make god knows how many top class anime,while aot was made by two diff. studios as joint project with a very big financial supporter.
quality needs money,a lot of money.and besides i like ship. animation and think it's anime quality is constantly improving again from 322.
studio pierrot is self managing,so they use their money,to make god knows how many top class anime,while aot was made by two diff. studios as joint project with a very big financial supporter.
quality needs money,a lot of money.and besides i like ship. animation and think it's anime quality is constantly improving again from 322.
The thing is, for a 26 episode animation of a high-profile manga like Shingeki no Kyojin, they'll have a freaking huge budget. Naruto, on the other hand, for all its popularity is too long and bland with fillers for its own good. There's only so much you can do for an anime that'll span 500 eps long, its not reasonable to expect AoT level animation from Naruto.
On an entirely different note, if you'd watch movies like '5 centimeters per second' or 'Garden of Words', you'll be asking yourselves why AoT doesn't have that much animation quality. The reason for this is, other than the fact that AoT wasn't directed by Makoto Shinkai, is that its much easier to invest all your budget on a 60min film to make it seem near realistic than it is for a 26-ep series. Another reason is that with the length of the series, the art will get blander, atleast in the eyes of the viewer, because you've seen them alot. Backgrounds will seem over-used and ugly, when if it was just 60mins long, you'd have called these epitome of animation.
On an entirely different note, if you'd watch movies like '5 centimeters per second' or 'Garden of Words', you'll be asking yourselves why AoT doesn't have that much animation quality. The reason for this is, other than the fact that AoT wasn't directed by Makoto Shinkai, is that its much easier to invest all your budget on a 60min film to make it seem near realistic than it is for a 26-ep series. Another reason is that with the length of the series, the art will get blander, atleast in the eyes of the viewer, because you've seen them alot. Backgrounds will seem over-used and ugly, when if it was just 60mins long, you'd have called these epitome of animation.
AllomnisymbolsparttwoT
Banned
I know that the aot animation is good and the fast action and fluidity make it look good but I never reqlly liked the animation/art as a whole ... I've been watching anime since I was a kid and I just somehow feel that that's not how anime is suppost to look like, the same goes for One Piece film Z, it was an awesome movie but I just prefer the average episode animation and same goes for Naruto and the episode with the meteor, I didnt like the nimation/art all tht much
I know most would disagree and think that's weird but that's just how I feel
I know most would disagree and think that's weird but that's just how I feel
Itachi Edo
Active member
I'm not complaining about the animation anymore. It's improved a great deal since it dipped in quality. I still cringe thinking about Itachi's DBZ style feet when he fought Naruto or the cheesy way the war was done early on.
They've really stepped it up on Madara, Madara vs the Kages, Obito vs Naruto, and now Kabuto vs Itachi and Sasuke.
They've really stepped it up on Madara, Madara vs the Kages, Obito vs Naruto, and now Kabuto vs Itachi and Sasuke.