Gentleman i rest my case with the likes of your persona,as debating further will prove itself useless as useless as it would be trying to understand and resolve the paradox of the irresistible object against the immovable objectU_U
And an ad hominem won't do you any good,as it proves your immaturity,and diminishes your already close to 0 debating skills(infinitesimal function)
Ad hominem is/are personal remark/s someone makes towards another person,while disregarding the claims made by such persona by ignoring the claim and targeting the person directly,and it enters the category of Logical Fallacy.It's used when someone is losing an argument and feels the need to regain it via discrediting the other.And you happen to fit perfectly in the description
I myself and other users have more than amply giving meaningful explanations as to why clearly nagato isn't winning this,but still there's the denial of some individuals like yourself,so I leave this debate with just one of the guys you +repped