His hair has too much style to be burned. Lol, jk. Maybe it didn't get the hair? I don't know.And his hair?
His hair has too much style to be burned. Lol, jk. Maybe it didn't get the hair? I don't know.And his hair?
That was some time ago. I kind of agreed. I knew he could absorb chakra(absorbing hashi's SM), but I didn't know it was the same of ninjutsu. I did think he had some absorbing tech, as a last alternative for an explanation, but i didn't know how and what, so I was confused.Well since you edited the first post I guess you agreed he absorbed it.
You must be registered for see linkshashi was asking did he absorb it
When it comes down to it he absorbed it.His hair has too much style to be burned. Lol, jk. Maybe it didn't get the hair? I don't know.
This is also a factor. That's exactly why I thought he didn't absorb it. But at the same time, other explanations or questions are valid: Then how did he absorb hashi's chakra? How did he took the amaterasu off his hair?If he absorbed Amaterasu, why was there fire burning on the ground?
When you use preta or any absorbing technique on a ninjutsu, you absorb the whole thing while it is on your body.
So if he preta Amaterasu, there wouldn't of been flames on his armor.
I explained the edit, and the questions are still there: Then why did he take the armor? Why was the armor still on fire, if he really absorbed it.When it comes down to it he absorbed it.
its the only option.
it touched his body and he had to have absorbed it.
hashirama was confused cuz he didnt know how id absorbed it, madara probably used something we havent seen like trump card
your thread has been debunked and you have to edit op
gg
you were debunked, cuz you thought he dodged it, you never said in your old op that he absorbed it.I explained the edit, and the questions are still there: Then why did he take the armor? Why was the armor still on fire, if he really absorbed it.
I edited because I was already thinking that, but I had no idea on how he could have possibly absorbed it. There were some theories, but nothing that answers every question or the points stated.
If you knew what debunked means, you wouldn't be using it. If it was debunked, there would be no doubt.
No one knows how he did it, only that he absorbed it. Taking off shirt was to show his chestI explained the edit, and the questions are still there: Then why did he take the armor? Why was the armor still on fire, if he really absorbed it.
I edited because I was already thinking that, but I had no idea on how he could have possibly absorbed it. There were some theories, but nothing that answers every question or the points stated.
If you knew what debunked means, you wouldn't be using it. If it was debunked, there would be no doubt.
I never said he dodged it. I said he took of the shirt and the armot to avoid being touched by it. You don't even know what you're talking about.you were debunked, cuz you thought he dodged it, you never said in your old op that he absorbed it.
Mabye he can only absorb it thur is physical body, or mabye he negated it.
the point is he didnt dodge it
That would be quite pointless, as he could just do as he did with the kages. Besides, if he absorbed it, why was the armort still on fire when he took it off?No one knows how he did it, only that he absorbed it. Taking off shirt was to show his chest
Because he took it off before absorbing all of it? Or he only did it to protect his body? I don't know lol the fire was completely extinguished anywayThat would be quite pointless, as he could just do as he did with the kages. Besides, if he absorbed it, why was the armort still on fire when he took it off?
It wasn't completely extinguished, some part of it was on the armor, and only stopped after burning it down. If he had absorbed it, the whole thing would dissapear. However, it did seem as there was less fire. But why not absorb it all?Because he took it off before absorbing all of it? Or he only did it to protect his body? I don't know lol the fire was completely extinguished anyway
This was the most logical post I read out of all the other senseless posting. I will agree now that he has a way to absorb through his skin using Preta, and can probably do the same with the other Paths.He can absorb ninjutsu without the rinnegan. Look at the last page where his foot was on that shinobi. You can see him absorbing chakara through his foot. I am sorry, but I don't know how to post scans. As you also stated, he absorbed Hashirama's sage mode as well. Furthermore, it would be kind of senseless for Kishi to just make it where Madara simply took off his shirt while saying that amaterasu isn't worth acknowledging. If all he did was take off his shirt, then all Sasuke would need to do is use amaterasu again. This time it would hit Madara's bare body. He could take off his shirt, but he couldn't just take off his entire back or mid-body. Therefore it makes no sense for Madara to have just taken off his shirt. What really happened was this: Amaterasu hit Madara. Madara let it burn for a few seconds while he was denouncing Sasuke's jutsu because he did not feel the need to act immediately. This in turn gave amaterasu the time to burn the shirt off. After gloating for a few seconds, Madara proceeded to absorb the jutsu (but his shirt had already been burned off). That is what happened. PS. If you disagree, I am willing to discuss this civilly. I just say that because some people resort to mindless anger and name calling when people disagree with them, so I wanted you to know that I am not one of those people and I don't want conflict.