Once again, someone makes a thread to respond to another thread, lol.
Don't worry tho mah Dantee, you're too awesome for me to criticize you.
Oh dantee.. You too xd
Yeah, but the kids they murdered would have done the same to them if given the chance
Why do I feel this is in defence of Itachi, cos a war is different from a one sided massacre
There are justifications for both sides.
Yeah, but the kids they murdered would have done the same to them if given the chance
Why do I feel this is in defence of Itachi, cos a war is different from a one sided massacre
doesn't matter. the results remain the same, sparing any victims even kids can lead to revenge. nagato confirms that.
That's some weakass argument, you sound like since we're all gonna die someday, why not let murderers roam free? Or since you can't use an item forever why not let a thief take it from you now? since the results are the same
Think about it all of them fought in wars so they either directly or indirectly killed children at some point in time. War sucks.
Pretty much this.Yeah, but the kids they murdered would have done the same to them if given the chance
Why do I feel this is in defence of Itachi, cos a war is different from a one sided massacre
Depends. Minato, Hiruzen, and Hashirama might have been fighting children who were trying to kill them. So they have to protect themselves.
However we haven't actually seen them fight shinobi who are classified as children. Most of Minato's fights in the Gaiden were through Adults or seasoned shinobi.
Pretty much this.
Lmao, If Itachi raped them, I bet you would justify that too. It's ok to like a character and disagree with a couple decisions they made. But please don't pass then off as perfect, Itachi didn't hold himself to such. He admitted killing the clan was a mistake, and he was wrong.
This is Naruto not our world where you bomb civilians.
They fought on the battlefield.
War =/= massacre