I think that when the judge actually made a mistake, he has to change his mind, when the mistake is an actual fact (something he didn't read for example, that's why i changed mine here).
In my debate against Mercer the veredict was changed because Kratos made his veredict based only on amaterasu. If he hadn't changed his veredict, it would have stil been a valid one. On the other hand, mine was changed because i actually made a mistake.
In my debate against Mercer the veredict was changed because Kratos made his veredict based only on amaterasu. If he hadn't changed his veredict, it would have stil been a valid one. On the other hand, mine was changed because i actually made a mistake.