Michael Brown supports are so gullible

[slimreaper]

Let me paint two pictures and you tell me which is in any way credible
Well call the first one A and the second B
A.
Man/boy robs a liquor store. he leaves the store with the stolen cigars. Noticing he is walking in the middle of the road, a local cop intends to get him on the side walk and at the most check his sobriety.

Having just robbed a liquor store, the man/boy assumes the cop is after him for that crime and not simply jay walking.

Under this assumption and carrying the evidence he thinks will be his doom, he sees only one option to charge the cop and try to make a break for it.

Fearing for his life, the cop opens fire on the "gentle giant" running at him hitting him four times in the arm and twice in the head( once in the top of the head)


B.

Man/boy robs a liquor store. he leaves the store with the stolen cigars. Noticing he is walking in the middle of the road, a local cop intends to get him on the side walk and at the most check his sobriety

The boy immediately gets on his knees and puts his arms in the air. The Evil pig the opens fire on the stationary boy obviously no threat just to spice up his afternoon

The cop is such a crappy shot that he hits this stationary boy 4 times in the arm.

You decide...

The cop wasn't close range and the boy wasn't running away. These are the things we know(thanks to the autopsy the parents funded).

Yet all these people blindly believe that this boy is a saint because hes black. What a joke these people are

 

[~Sky~]

Better watch out, you're obviously a racist for looking at the facts.

^ Sarcasm btw

 

[Tera Path]

In my eyes they're both wrong.

A. Why would you fire 6 times at one person charging at you, clearly without a weapon?

B. Why would you fire 4 times at a person that has already signed his white flag?

B seems worse for me, this person isn't doing anything bad and you decide to shoot him.
Luckily this cop had crappy aim otherwise person B would've been done for.

 

[slimreaper]

In my eyes they're both wrong.

A. Why would you fire 6 times at one person charging at you, clearly without a weapon?

B. Why would you fire 4 times at a person that has already signed his white flag?

B seems worse for me, this person isn't doing anything bad and you decide to shoot him.
Luckily this cop had crappy aim otherwise person B would've been done for.

A is the one that actually happened. B is the one they want you to believe happened

 

[Versta]

somebody got shot cuz he's a criminal big deal, jeez

 

[Sovereignty]

So you have to shoot somebody 7 times because he robbed a store ?
Shoot him in his f*cking head ? People like you are so ignorant.


And how did you know that A really happened, did you see it ?
​

​

 

[slimreaper]

So you have to shoot somebody 7 times because he robbed a store ?
Shoot him in his f*cking head ? People like you are so ignorant.


And how did you know that A really happened, did you see it ?
​

​

A, is the story of the police. Its not that he robbed that store that got him shot. Its running at a police officer.

You know how I know he ran at the cop? The autopsy showed he was shot in the top of the head. To shoot someone in the top of the head from the front; you would need to be running at someone.

Tell me oh ignorant one... Why would a cop shoot someone 6 times when all he knows is that hes jay walking? Are you really that easy to fool?

 

[Sovereignty]

A, is the story of the police. Its not that he robbed that store that got him shot. Its running at a police officer.

You know how I know he ran at the cop? The autopsy showed he was shot in the top of the head. To shoot someone in the top of the head from the front; you would need to be running at someone.

Tell me oh ignorant one... Why would a cop shoot someone 6 times when all he knows is that hes jay walking? Are you really that easy to fool?

Seems like you are the fool here since you blatantly believe what the police is telling you,
He already shot him a couple of times he was down already why shoot him extra in his head.
the boy was unarmed ffs.


You must be sick-minded to talk this good.
You would talk different if somebody from your family was shot a couple of times.

​

​

 

[Conspirator.]

The police raction may have been over the top, but the bottom line is that Michael Brown was obviously showing some resistance to the police. There's no evidence that he surrendered quickly and quietly. So both parties were at fault.

 

[Joker]

The police raction may have been over the top, but the bottom line is that Michael Brown was obviously showing some resistance to the police. There's no evidence that he surrendered quickly and quietly. So both parties were at fault.

Basically this.

 

[V h o]

How exactly can you justify shooting an unarmed person? Not like the cop could aim for his leg....or not the head :|

 

[Solo]

Truth be told, I don't give a shit about any of this. Nevertheless, this was stated:

Dr. Baden provided a diagram of the entry wounds, and noted that the six shots produced numerous wounds. Some of the bullets entered and exited several times, including one that left at least five different wounds.

“This one here looks like his head was bent downward,” he said, indicating the wound at the very top of Mr. Brown’s head. “It can be because he’s giving up, or because he’s charging forward at the officer.”

He stressed that his information does not assign blame or justify the shooting.

 

[SAGE OF 777 PATH]

wow can't believe what i just read a very ignorant comment by a clearly ignorant person u were not thee so for u to say its the "police facts" is just plain stupid. the police have been known to lie lets not act lie they are saints either before u play that card. and shooting someone in their head come on u telling me a trained officer well let me put it in your words the just and respectable officer could not have shot the guy in his leg or something had to shoot him six times then not even call the paramedic or report it right after he shot hi instead left the boy in the road for hours before it was even reported and please also tell me why did the police wait 5 days before telling what happened yes i will tell u why so they could come up with a story and this story is clearly a lie.... I am not justifying any wrong if michael brown robe that store definitely in the wrong and African Americansl are rioting and protesting now but what about when u kill your own ppl wheres the protesting then? We as a nation have too do better I wished we lived in a world were racism and violence doesn't exist but that want happen until Christ returns and its just sad we can't work together. I'm sure a lot about to disagree but I really could care less.

 

[The Work]

He had other options like a Taser and Pepper Spray but I do see your point.

This sure doesn't give the people a right to destroy their community.

The protesters wonder why the cops are arming up it's because their community is looting and destroying stores.

 

[Dannie]

He's not a saint because he's black, and who said he was a saint? It's the fact that he was at the wrong place at the wrong time, and ended up getting shot. He did not deserve to be shot at all. The situation and what Micheal did was not fair to what the cop resulted in doing. The crime did not equal the punishment. You suspect me of robbing a few cigars? Ok, cool. You're the one with the authority and the weapon so I guess it's fine for you to just shoot anybody you feel suspicious of, especially if he's black.

And who are you fooling with this thread? This is obviously a racist hate thread in disguise towards blacks. Obviously they are both at fault but it's not fair for the black dude to have gotten shot, especially when he was unarmed. Seriously, what was the worst he could have done to the cop? Stare him to death? Please.

Obviously if the tables were turned and this was a white victim you wouldn't be calling anyone "gullible"

 

[Sovereignty]

Slimreaper is always racist to any race, I hate his ignorant ass.

​

​

 

[slimreaper]

Slimreaper is always racist to any race, I hate his ignorant ass.

​

​

I look at the case with some common sense and Im the racist?

let me go loot and destroy my neighbor hood just because one black kid died. But yeah im the racist

 

[To Whatever]

You don't shoot a guy multiple times. Especially if it's petty theft

Even if he was resisting, one of those shots where to the head. Was that shit necessary?

I look at the case with some common sense and Im the racist?

let me go loot and destroy my neighbor hood just because one black kid died. But yeah im the racist

People riot over sports.

People look for a reason to raise anarchy, you should know this.

You're not racist, but you're lampshading the fact that a man who was resisting arrest was shot and killed with multiple gunshot wounds. One being in the skull

 

[Aim64C]

You don't shoot a guy multiple times. Especially if it's petty theft

Even if he was resisting, one of those shots where to the head. Was that shit necessary?



People riot over sports.

People look for a reason to raise anarchy, you should know this.

You're not racist, but you're lampshading the fact that a man who was resisting arrest was shot and killed with multiple gunshot wounds. One being in the skull

Do you have any idea what I, a 5' 11", 150lb guy can do to you "unarmed?"

Unless you're fairly practiced in martial arts, you'll realize you're being curb-stomped right about the time my boot heel connects to your skull. Even if you have 100lbs on me.

Brown was 6'4" and weighed in at 280lbs of pure muscle. The guy could lay any one of us out, cold, in a single hit and possibly induce trauma we'd never recover from.

I do not believe Brown was an 'evil' person - but he had clearly made some poor decisions that were catching up with him that evening. For whatever reason - he decided robbing a store was a good idea. Perhaps he was under the influence of drugs - we have to wait for the full toxicology report.

More than one separate witness accounts taken at different times collaborate the notion that Brown double-backed on the officer and was shot while charging the officer.

If I start charging you from 30 feet - you have about two, maybe three seconds before I'm on you.

Try it, yourself - have a friend stand 30 feet away and charge at you. That's how long you have to figure out whether you are going to live or quite possibly die because a guy with nearly 100lbs more muscle than you is going to be on top of you. You can even try it from 60 feet. It's still barely enough time for most people to begin reacting to the threat (since most people have not been trained/drilled in martial scenarios).

The shots that hit the arm are relatively consistent with "rush" where the shoulder is extended forward while the final, fatal shots are consistent with Brown entering into an attempt to tackle the officer (waist bent, back straight, head down, shoulder braced).

In a situation like that - you shoot and stop only when the threat stops (or when your magazine is empty). You aim center-mass and squeeze the trigger.

"You could shoot a leg"

No, no you can't. For starters - that's going to do nothing to stop someone like Brown. You're not going to do enough damage with a service pistol to the leg to do much more than drive the guy's adrenaline even higher. Not that is going to matter in that short span of time.

Second - the leg is one of the worst places to shoot someone if you wish to keep them alive. Think about it. Most of the energy your body uses for moving is in your legs - your leg muscles. The legs are loaded with very large, deep arteries that love to be the source of fatal bleeding. Worse, arteries are usually under tension - so when they get damaged, they actually 'shoot' about four to six inches higher than the wound. So if you shoot a guy in the upper thigh, near the waist - he's going to need major surgery just to find the artery and stop the bleeding.

The legs are just a bad place to shoot unless you're a sadist - but then you should just shoot for the kidneys - that's a long and painful way to go - and if they survive, they have to go on dialysis for the rest of their lives (doubly cruel - have your life tied to a machine for a 4 hour long process 3 times a week).

Obviously, the arm wasn't working.

And when the kid shoves his head in front of the barrel - there's not many other options for where the bullet can go. At least it was about as painless of a way for him to go as we know exists (obviously, it's very difficult to judge just how painful/painless the process of death is - while it would be kind of interesting to be able to kill myself in various ways and tell you all how it felt, there are some inconvenient realities for that idea).

Now if people would stop throwing Molotov Cocktails and calling for the lynching of people, it'd be great.

Especially if they would GO HOME to their OWN STATE.

Seriously - these ****s come in, uninvited, to our state just to steal shit after the sun goes down. The Communist Party of Chicago, Black Panthers, and Islamic Nation have bussed these people in, and they need to go home.

It's like dealing with drunk neighbors who knock on your door at 2 in the morning and start making a sandwich in your kitchen. You keep telling them to go home while they stumble around and break stuff in your house. You don't really hate them - so you don't want to beat the shit out of them, even though they are being rude as hell.... but they need to go home, sleep it off, and be listen to a lecture about moderation.

 

[Multiply]

Regardless of what anyone says, there's absolutely no reason for the kid to have been shot as many times as he was.

Spoiler

You must be registered for see images

Those are where the points at which Michael Brown was shot at. Now, as we know, the one at the top of his head is the kill shot, and the bullet that killed him.

A gunshot wound to his arm could show either that he was hit while walking away from the shooter with his back to the officer, or that he was facing the shooter with his arm up, either in a surrender position, defensive position, or other motion, Baden said.

So the gunshots to the arms are automatically taken out of the argument that Michael Brown charged or attacked the officer.

How the witness says it occurred.

After the officer confronts the two suspects, the witnesses's story checks out. Michael raised his hands up as if to surrender, and the other teen ran. The cop begins to fire upon them, and Michael is hit while running away(as the witness says), and falls to the ground. Which is where the remaining 4 bullets would have been executed. 1 hitting his chest, 1 hitting neck, 1 hitting his chin, and the final 2 bullets that knocked him unconscious.

The two shots that hit Brown in the head were likely among the last that hit him and traveled from the back of his head to the front, indicating that Brown's head was tilted forward, either because he was bending over or falling over, forensic expert Dr. Michael Baden said at a news conference today. Brown had abrasions on his face from where he "fell flat down unprotected," Baden said.

So not only was Brown defenseless, but he was on the ground, face down, bleeding out from wounds he had already sustained. Surely that would have been the appropriate time to place handcuffs on Brown and call for back up. However, the officer decided he needed to execute this 17 year old with seemingly no cause.

That is most nearly what occurred, given the evidence we have. I'm not saying this is 100% correct, but I'll put my trust in the forensics experts, rather than the media and police.

No one is calling Brown a saint. The kid robbed a damn store for God's sake. However, that does not mean he needed to be killed or even shot. This is happening all too often. Shoot first, questions later.


Slim, just face it bro. You're racist. Lol