- Joined
- Aug 19, 2010
- Messages
- 946
- Reaction score
- 86
You must be registered for see images
Oi, it's really not a big deal. they only use that on people who are a danger to society. Our government isn't going to start pulling masses off the street and lock them up.
Government is given power by the people to govern the people; the second the people decide not to consent to a government, that government no longer has power.
If our government started pulling people off the street our country would riot. There'd be a revolution. This isn't worth worrying about.
Lincoln put the state of Maryland under Martial Law during the civil war. Maryland was on the southern boarder with the Confederation so Lincoln declared martial law in the state to snuff out any uprisings and make sure Washington D.C. wouldn't be taken.
Oi, it's really not a big deal. they only use that on people who are a danger to society. Our government isn't going to start pulling masses off the street and lock them up.
Government is given power by the people to govern the people; the second the people decide not to consent to a government, that government no longer has power.
If our government started pulling people off the street our country would riot. There'd be a revolution. This isn't worth worrying about.
Lincoln put the state of Maryland under Martial Law during the civil war. Maryland was on the southern boarder with the Confederation so Lincoln declared martial law in the state to snuff out any uprisings and make sure Washington D.C. wouldn't be taken.
Oi, it's really not a big deal. they only use that on people who are a danger to society. Our government isn't going to start pulling masses off the street and lock them up.
Government is given power by the people to govern the people; the second the people decide not to consent to a government, that government no longer has power.
If our government started pulling people off the street our country would riot. There'd be a revolution. This isn't worth worrying about.
Lincoln put the state of Maryland under Martial Law during the civil war. Maryland was on the southern boarder with the Confederation so Lincoln declared martial law in the state to snuff out any uprisings and make sure Washington D.C. wouldn't be taken.
well, no one will ever be truly "free" in america or anywhere else..
Your only save if your White, other wise ur a prime target of this law esp if your Muslim.
Lincoln, I would argue, was definitely more of a dictator than a sovereign leader. He stopped US mail, suspended habeas corpus, and closed ports without the permission of Congress. He did what he "wanted" to secure the position of the Union through brute strength of the army. He stationed battleships outside Southern ports to pretty much starve the Confederacy.
Don't freak out guys. As long as a conservative Republican doesn't become president, all people will be safe (Romney, Santorum, even Gingrich). Watch C-Span and you'll see how awful Republicans talk about other races.
.
You obviously have a very shallow view of the bigger picture....I'm black, does that make me a prime target/suspect....no it just puts me in with the majority of those who are affected....
.