Mangekyou Theory.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Forget Me Not

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
742
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Font is unsightly; secondary, the writing style exercised is grandiloquent for the targeted audience. A substantive revision should have been practiced previously: even if a ramble.

Concertedly, the proposition is likely incorrect.
Lol, do you guys know each other? You both write pretty similarly. I've seen like a handful of users here using the same writing convention you're using. (e.g., superscripts, fonts, etc.)

Are you all from Naruto Forums or something?
 

Forget Me Not

Active member
Regular
Joined
Dec 25, 2011
Messages
742
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Edit: Allegedly, your writing is but a copy of the Databook's entry for Tsukuyomi.[ ] [/FONT][/INDENT]
Lol, that's pretty funny. Plagiarism I suppose.

So his post is a roughly paraphrased version of the databook verbatim? If so, that's disappointing.
 

Varrah

Active member
Regular
Joined
Aug 27, 2012
Messages
1,062
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Lol, do you guys know each other? You both write pretty similarly. I've seen like a handful of users here using the same writing convention you're using. (e.g., superscripts, fonts, etc.)

Are you all from Naruto Forums or something?

Caught a glimpse of his posts on NF; he essentially is a imitator. Also, aside from -Logic-, there are people that imitate my post style: even if the dynamics are not amended. He's presumably one of them.

Lol, that's pretty funny. Plagiarism I suppose.

So his post is a roughly paraphrased version of the databook verbatim? If so, that's disappointing.

Pretty much. That reason is tragic, right Tragic?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top