- Joined
- Jun 21, 2014
- Messages
- 2,624
- Reaction score
- 201
Why do people try to go against manga facts? I already know their opinion does not matter but I wonder why. Is it that they can't face facts. They love to question an Author's statements and everything like why.
Ex.) "Itachi is Invincible with Yata Mirror and Totsuka Blade"
This shouldn't be questioned because a clear explanation was given on how he is invincible.
Ex.) "My Susanoo is destruction incarnate, a stroke of this blade contains the power to destroy all things in the universe"
This also shouldn't be questioned we know it is possible because his Perfect Susanoo is the embodiment of destruction therefore it is possible and is fact.
There is no contradiction between the two. Neither discredit the other because they never crossed paths and if they did we wouldn't know who would win.
Moving on, the only time a statement should be questioned is when there is no explanation at all.
Ex.) Cell's solar system statement.
There was no explanation for how he could do it however people blindly believed because previous villain could destroy planets with a finger.
I personally don't care about Cell's statement because in fiction anything is possible but I would only "truly" believe if I understand how the character can do it meaning an EXPLANATION was given.
An example of person trying to disprove mangafacts but ends up looking like a tard:
There was this one D*ck that claiming he debunked the GetBackers series, one of his arguments was that the black hole that one of the characters created wasn't a real black hole because there was light still in the room or that the character was suppose to be sucked up not injured. Both of these arguments are weak because one is a matter of author art style and the other is a show of characters strength. GetBackers is one of those series that goes into detail a lot about many things giving numbers and all. Also the guy didn't read the whole manga he only read a few parts.
Ex.) "Itachi is Invincible with Yata Mirror and Totsuka Blade"
This shouldn't be questioned because a clear explanation was given on how he is invincible.
Ex.) "My Susanoo is destruction incarnate, a stroke of this blade contains the power to destroy all things in the universe"
This also shouldn't be questioned we know it is possible because his Perfect Susanoo is the embodiment of destruction therefore it is possible and is fact.
There is no contradiction between the two. Neither discredit the other because they never crossed paths and if they did we wouldn't know who would win.
Moving on, the only time a statement should be questioned is when there is no explanation at all.
Ex.) Cell's solar system statement.
There was no explanation for how he could do it however people blindly believed because previous villain could destroy planets with a finger.
I personally don't care about Cell's statement because in fiction anything is possible but I would only "truly" believe if I understand how the character can do it meaning an EXPLANATION was given.
An example of person trying to disprove mangafacts but ends up looking like a tard:
There was this one D*ck that claiming he debunked the GetBackers series, one of his arguments was that the black hole that one of the characters created wasn't a real black hole because there was light still in the room or that the character was suppose to be sucked up not injured. Both of these arguments are weak because one is a matter of author art style and the other is a show of characters strength. GetBackers is one of those series that goes into detail a lot about many things giving numbers and all. Also the guy didn't read the whole manga he only read a few parts.
