Ok if Sasuke killed him. Than Madara killed Sasuke. Meaning Madara > Itachi.Itachi died because Sasuke killed him because that's what Itachi wanted, though Itachi was ill, it wasn't aids.
Ok if Sasuke killed him. Than Madara killed Sasuke. Meaning Madara > Itachi.Itachi died because Sasuke killed him because that's what Itachi wanted, though Itachi was ill, it wasn't aids.
Now that's what you call a troll. Read my post carefully.Ok if Sasuke killed him. Than Madara killed Sasuke. Meaning Madara > Itachi.
When I said aids, I ment the illness. You tried to correct me by saying Sasuke killed him, but Itachi had a illness. Now since you admitted Sasuke killed him I said "well Madara killed Sasuke so Madara > Itachi". Not sure how you think I am a troll when you cannot get out of your own biasness?Now that's what you call a troll. Read my post carefully.
Edit: I actually thought you was going to be serious but you're just like all the other trolls who can't read the manga and don't accept manga facts.
Bias? I'm just sating facts here. Yes if Sasuke and Itachi didn't fight he would have died to the illness but at that current point Sasuke did "kill him" but again like I said Itachi let Sasuke kill him because that's what he wanted.When I said aids, I ment the illness. You tried to correct me by saying Sasuke killed him, but Itachi had a illness. Now since you admitted Sasuke killed him I said "well Madara killed Sasuke so Madara > Itachi". Not sure how you think I am a troll when you cannot get out of your own biasness?
Regardless of how he let Sasuke kill him. Itachi was gonna die to his illness anyways. This statement in bold would only come into play, if Itachi had intentions of doing that in the first place. Also we are not sure how severe this illness was. Like how he got it or why he got it? All we know is that it was a life threatening illness. Any who my original statement still stands.Bias? I'm just sating facts here. Yes if Sasuke and Itachi didn't fight he would have died to the illness but at that current point Sasuke did "kill him" but again like I said Itachi let Sasuke kill him because that's what he wanted.
P.S I'm pretty sure that Itachi could have just walked into Konoha like before, Genjutsu (control) Tsunade and get her to cure him but since he was going to die to Sasuke (because he wanted) anyway there was no point.
They both died by something natural.That logic only works in fanfiction. Here's the real truth to all of this.
Aids solo > Itachi
Black Zetsu solos > Madara
They both got soloed by something natural.
Your original statement is only half true. It is true about Madara but not for Itachi, even if Itachi was going to die by his illness (though he could have got cured) he didn't die to it. He died to Sasuke like HE wanted and like Obito said, if Itachi wanted he'd have beat Sasuke with ease.Regardless of how he let Sasuke kill him. Itachi was gonna die to his illness anyways. This statement in bold would only come into play, if Itachi had intentions of doing that in the first place. Also we are not sure how severe this illness was. Like how he got it or why he got it? All we know is that it was a life threatening illness. Any who my original statement still stands.
They both died by something natural.
With ease? Lol Come on now don't underrate Sasuke too much. Even if that statement is true the illness would have killed Itachi anyways. So there is no point in denying it. Also if you saw the fight correctly than Itachi was spitting out blood before his death.Your original statement is only half true. It is true about Madara but not for Itachi, even if Itachi was going to die by his illness (though he could have got cured) he didn't die to it. He died to Sasuke like HE wanted and like Obito said, if Itachi wanted he'd have beat Sasuke with ease.