Her interaction with Lukundo.
Town. The result is in my posts, this is a useless question. Like if you wanted the response you'd find it.
Why are you acting daft? You're misconstruing what I'm saying, I'm arguing against the narrative that the lynch was too easy and there were no movements, ergo he's town. That narrative entails Luk being scum.
What does this mean?
I'm objectively not. Believing your case on someone is pretty fucking straight forward as far as reasoning goes. Especially when blabbering about tinfoils and wagon movements to reach conclusions of dead air, dead villager is dumb. I'm not using it as a starting point and hunting for Luk's partner, that would be the actual "one dimensional" mindset. The fact that this is a flipless game is EXACTLY why. You're overstating how believing we lynched scum is going to affect the game going further, it changes absolutely nothing.
Define scum hunting.
I believe questioning people, sharing thoughts, prodding people, trying to generate activity is exactly what scum hunting is about. Enlighten me please.
Your conclusion here is awful. Feels like you're forcing yourself to scum read me by fence-sitting on my Naomi dynamic which you're unfamiliar with. No matter how many times it's cleared up to you that's just how we roll, you're just closing your eyes and using that unfamiliarity as an excuse to keep shading me there. Also like in the 70% first part of the ISO, you had no real negative stance and were even having some positive ping that you were trying to disregard as NAI. Like wtf?
Don't get me started on the angle of "thinking Luk was bad" = not a good look".