Kishimoto.

FranklinGTAV

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
80
so , i have 2 questions.

1st - why did kishimoto changed completely his writting methods from part 1 to part 2?

2nd - why did he completely forgot about the kawarimi / substitution no jutsu ?
 

Trúth

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Mar 23, 2014
Messages
12,293
Reaction score
1,518
Because he felt like it? It's his story
 

UCE

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
12,766
Reaction score
963
1. A person has to progress huh?

2.is useless at this point.
 

Pirate King

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Feb 9, 2013
Messages
5,422
Reaction score
579
1. A lot if people think he copied HxH, so the reason it changed was because he couldn't copy something :eek:

Just speculation tho
 

Colonel Armstrong

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
6,354
Reaction score
429
plot progression and he didnt forget he just added other more interesting things
 

FranklinGTAV

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
80
1. A lot if people think he copied HxH, so the reason it changed was because he couldn't copy something :eek:

Just speculation tho

my other guess is bc he was inspired by dbz (this part is obvious) and bc he wanted to do like a "masterpiece" such as the next dbz ?
 

Kratoss

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
379
Reaction score
55
I think saying completely is a stretch. I think his writing style evolved naturally after he gained more experience (you can even notice that his art got better), and I think he became a better writer as time went on, incorporating a lot of original and unique ideas, that aren't too common in shounen manga, whether in it's themes, or storytelling.

Because it's a simple art. And the fights became more advanced since that.
 

Tobiramen

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
May 28, 2014
Messages
500
Reaction score
42
1- story belongs to him
2- story belongs to him
 

FranklinGTAV

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
80
I think saying completely is a stretch. I think his writing style evolved naturally after he gained more experience (you can even notice that his art got better), and I think he became a better writer as time went on, incorporating a lot of original and unique ideas, that aren't too common in shounen manga, whether in it's themes, or storytelling.

Because it's a simple art. And the fights became more advanced since that.

the konoha 11 didn't got much development in shippuden , when you compare the shippuden "season" with the part 1... you'll see the flaws .

He started smoking something. o_O

ahahhahaha , i'm dead.
 

Natsu Shazneel

Banned
Supreme
Joined
Jan 21, 2012
Messages
37,690
Reaction score
1,999
Simple answer. Because not everything stays the same forever. If Kishimotto kept the same method for long. We all would have gotten bored of this manga and left it.
 

Kratoss

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
379
Reaction score
55
the konoha 11 didn't got much development in shippuden , when you compare the shippuden "season" with the part 1... you'll see the flaws .
Why is that a flaw exactly?

The only problem I found was Lee and Neji were neglected despite being important and well developed in part 1, that's the only flaw I can agree with. Shikamaru, Hinata, Sakura, even Chouji (which was a waste of time imo) got development and focus on Shippuden, because they were already important in part 1, the rest of konoha 11 were not really important and weren't fleshed out as a whole, Ino, Kiba, Shino are just minor characters from the beginning, they were only relevant in the Chunnin exams, and when the friendship theme about Naruto was on screen.

And considering more interesting characters got more focus on Shippuden, I don't blame Kishimoto on that decision.
 

FranklinGTAV

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
80
Why is that a flaw exactly?

The only problem I found was Lee and Neji were neglected despite being important and well developed in part 1, that's the only flaw I can agree with. Shikamaru, Hinata, Sakura, even Chouji (which was a waste of time imo) got development and focus on Shippuden, because they were already important in part 1, the rest of konoha 11 were not really important and weren't fleshed out as a whole, Ino, Kiba, Shino are just minor characters from the beginning, they were only relevant in the Chunnin exams, and when the friendship theme about Naruto was on screen.

And considering more interesting characters got more focus on Shippuden, I don't blame Kishimoto on that decision.

we could have seen the konoha eleven defeat some guys... we haven't seen that , nor the maximum of their powers etc etc , plus where is the strategy in it now(in the series) like for example , in part 1 , you saw shurikens and other stuff , now you're not seeing nor kunais nor shurikens nor strategy at all ...?
 
Last edited:

oShux

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
4,369
Reaction score
492
I think saying completely is a stretch. I think his writing style evolved naturally after he gained more experience (you can even notice that his art got better), and I think he became a better writer as time went on, incorporating a lot of original and unique ideas, that aren't too common in shounen manga, whether in it's themes, or storytelling.

Because it's a simple art. And the fights became more advanced since that.
Advanced my ass.
 

oShux

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Aug 14, 2012
Messages
4,369
Reaction score
492
Why is that a flaw exactly?

The only problem I found was Lee and Neji were neglected despite being important and well developed in part 1, that's the only flaw I can agree with. Shikamaru, Hinata, Sakura, even Chouji (which was a waste of time imo) got development and focus on Shippuden, because they were already important in part 1, the rest of konoha 11 were not really important and weren't fleshed out as a whole, Ino, Kiba, Shino are just minor characters from the beginning, they were only relevant in the Chunnin exams, and when the friendship theme about Naruto was on screen.

And considering more interesting characters got more focus on Shippuden, I don't blame Kishimoto on that decision.

How was that a waste of time?
 

Kratoss

Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2014
Messages
379
Reaction score
55
Don't know how is that directly relevant to what I last posted.

Why would you think people would be interested in that? To answer your question there is Shikamaru who was the protagonist of the Hidan and Kakzu arc, and defeated Hidan. I think including them on the war arc, and supporting Naruto was good enough, no need to drag down the manga and give them focus, when some of them are not really interesting or relevant to the plot imo.

Random question. The strategy aspect of the series is still there, just not as strong as it was.
 

Angelic.

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
23,034
Reaction score
1,537
the last shuriken we saw was obito blasting them out of his eye vortex
 

FranklinGTAV

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 15, 2014
Messages
1,654
Reaction score
80
the last shuriken we saw was obito blasting them out of his eye vortex

exactly.

Don't know how is that directly relevant to what I last posted.

Why would you think people would be interested in that? To answer your question there is Shikamaru who was the protagonist of the Hidan and Kakzu arc, and defeated Hidan. I think including them on the war arc, and supporting Naruto was good enough, no need to drag down the manga and give them focus, when some of them are not really interesting or relevant to the plot imo.

Random question. The strategy aspect of the series is still there, just not as strong as it was.

yes , i saw that , but think about it , the konoha 11 are the future of konoha , right? so why didn't kishimoto put them doing something through the whole story?
 
Top