Where the hell is this coming from?Beckman/King>Marco>Katakuri
Its too early, we haven't seen Katakuri get challenged yet and he probably won't be challenged at all this arc.
But the gap between these two should be small, two different fighters with different abilities.
Its easy to use the admiral excuse for Marco but its not like he defeated any of them, he could hold his own due to the sheer nature of his fruit, none of the admirals were threatened by Marco. I imagine Katakuri has his own ways of holding his own with admiral level guys too, but that doesn't make him admiral level.
True maybe I'm not giving Marco enough credit, but I just dont think he's on admiral level or that close. I would put him on the level of Sabo, a guy who can hold his own but can't defeat admirals.Why do you and a lot of others downplay a lot of Marcos feats by blaming his fruit Jesus that is his fruit so why can't he use it by that logic kizaru could only contend with marco because of his fruit I mean what has he shown except for popping in and out of no where and nuking people with his fruit.... you see how ridiculous that sounds
Take away zoros swords he would not be as strong as he usually is same with luffy and his fruit
I mean marco had speed strength stamina etc to compete and challenge a 3 admirals all in 1 day something that has only been done by whitebeard himself :|
If someone else lets say Bellamy had Marcos fruit sure he has the regeneration but does he have the mastery? No the stamina to use it efficiently ? No or how about strength and speed to contend with admirals ?? No not really
People should stop downplaying marco as if he's not top tier