They praised the 95 March but that was about it and that was only because they didn't think it would be successful.
What news articles have you been reading, bud?
the media doesn't want people to know about justice or else.
The media has shied away somewhat from covering the "... or else" aspect. The problem is that the liberals in the media don't want to admit that they have been backing domestic terrorists.
They're orivately owned. They get orders on what to report on.
There are many things going on all over the world each and every day. Any news agency requires some kind of directive upon what is to be covered and what is not to be covered. The fact that media is privately owned is neither here nor there in the grand scheme of things.
They didn't want people to know about this. My man it never appeared on the news where I live at all.
It appeared on my news stations. It appeared on most of my conservative blogs that I check up on, as well.
And it didn't happen the first two years after 95 shows how much you know.
*shrug* When you're up against a dragon, you take your points where you can get them, I suppose.
By the way, arguing with you is a waste of my time since you pros to think blacks that are murdered by police deserve to be murdered so im ending this right here. I don't have the patience to go back and forth with someone as misinformed as you.
When you break the law and attack police officers, you get shot. If you get to break the law and attack police officers... then get away with it - you may as well live in a society without laws. 20 years of not having laws in various sections of the inner-city has reduced them to crime-riddled husks.
The genuine incidents of police brutality never get covered - regardless of the races involved. The ones that get spun out of proportion are the ones where a black man is guilty as sin and gets shot by a police officer doing his job. This is because the agenda is to destroy local law enforcement.
It's a policy agenda I've covered before and this is behavior I predicted well over a year ago. The goal is to create a virtual palestinian authority that governs itself under its own rules while claiming oppression by the surrogate nation that supplies it. It's an evolution of the strategy we used under the Clinton administration to break up Yugoslavia when Al Qaeda operatives were flown into Bosnia to train local militias in terrorist and propaganda techniques so that Serbia could be bombed when they reacted to protect the sovereignty of their nation.
Very similar policy playing out in the United States for a very similar objective.
No one is claiming that it is solely them or them at all.If the argument is that the welfare system is holding blacks down and back then I'm certain people that follow this movement would agree that it must go to reach equality. Equality is not a moving standard. It's extremely simple. Treat everyone the same.
Equality as demanded by this movement is a moving standard.
Blacks are treated the same in both law and society. One could even make the argument that blacks are considerably advantaged due to various affirmative action programs that make it a requirement for certain institutions to hire blacks in representation of the surrounding population.
What are blacks that follow this movement asking for? Stop killing blacks as if we don't matter and treat us the same... Or else... What else are they requesting 'the white man' give us? The only reparations we're asking for is to be treated equally in the country that says that all men are created equal. In the country that is supposed to be a melting pot of culture. For some reason the further we've gotten as a nation, the less we remember that statement.
Where are blacks being killed as if they don't matter?
It's the truth.
Throughout the 60s, blacks were overwhelmingly supported by white populations in their quest for civil rights. Popular culture celebrates and deifies the actions of civil rights leaders. Box office hits are movies about historic moments in civil rights history - such as "Remember The Titans."
Throughout much of the 80s, 90s, and 2000s, blacks were another part of society - only mildly more visible than the Asian populations. Groups like the Ku Klux Klan have been public taboo for decades, as have the neo-nazis and other supremacist groups; while similar groups from black culture (the Black Panthers) have been turned into icons within comic books as heroes.
For all intents and purposes, blacks were treated equally by society.
Even if we want to turn our focus on the targets of welfare programs - the corrosive effects of welfare are seen through all populations, black, white, asian, latino - it destroys them all equally. It's just that blacks happen to qualify for it in higher percentages and opt to enroll in those programs (though it is the goal of such programs to expand to every corner of society).
No one is holding blacks down.
Yet we are being told that we are holding them down - that our society is evil and needs to be destroyed.
I don't think you realize the degree to which your own mind has been corrupted and become obsessed with the idea that every ill that befalls you is somehow because you are black or is made worse because you are black.
If you're treating a black person as you would any other human no one is asking more of you. However, it doesn't stop there. It's not simply about black and white. It's everyone, in my opinion, and that's where I differ with the Minister. I think everyone should be about peace and love and I think it's completely attainable. I do think there will be trouble and unnecessary violence along the way, but as long as we stay on the path of love nothing can stop us. Shit, I probably won't live to see the day where everyone is truly equal, but being apart of a movement that helps progress that thought is enough for me.
When you realize these people are not about peace and love, but are about carnal rage and control, look me up.
These people are interested in nothing but serving their own self interest while deluding others into being pawns in their charade. Keep in mind that pawns are expendable, and you will soon start to see them use you as such.
The Minister knows it's about everyone he's not just about black. But he puts black first because why wouldn't you think about your own people first?
Here in lay the problem.
When I think of the way laws should be, color doesn't factor into my mind at all. I don't look at law, state, society, etc as being contingent upon race or color. When I discuss economics - the concepts don't change just because one person is a different race. When I discuss ethics, race doesn't even enter my mind unless some kind of racial conflict is the specific subject of ethics (in which case, it really isn't much different than any other self-affiliated group having a conflict with another).
When I speak of the way a free nation should be - race isn't a factor. I don't see it as being for 'whites' any more than I see it being for 'asians.' The goal of the policies I espouse to accompany a successful nation should apply pretty much the world over, provided the culture of the people can uphold the concepts established by the government (for example - in some areas, the culture simply doesn't believe in a government being limited, and the importance of such restrictions is largely lost upon the population... which means it would be difficult to check the power of government with democratic processes as the population is used to ceding massive amounts of authority to the government by virtue of it being the government).
When I speak of law - the law applies equally to all people.
This man is not speaking about policy. He is not speaking, even, about ideology. He is simply speaking to the tendency of people to form tribal groupings. He is lumping black people together and attempting to make the argument that they should feel persecuted and that they should be angry that they are persecuted - angry enough to rise up and kill those who they feel are responsible for the persecution.
It is a message that relieves one of individual responsibility for the decisions one has made in life.
The Minister had people of various races speak at Justice or else about their issues. Justice or else wasn't just shot injustice done to blacks, but Injustice done to black, brown, red, yellow, and poor white. You should give it a watch. It was unity like never before seen.
You must be registered for see links
" A female Native American speaker led a crowd in a chant of “down, down USA” at the Million Man March in Washington, D.C., on Saturday.
In her speech, the woman claimed that former Libyan dictator Muammar “Gaddafi is still alive” and called on President Obama to pardon Leonard Peltier, a Native American activist who was convicted of murdering two FBI officers in 1975. "
Sounds like a mass temper tantrum, to me.
I've been to rallies, before. This one was nothing special in what people felt at it. I could get into the psychology of how it works, and all that, but you're not interested in such things.
I was there man. It was beautiful
*shrug*
It is unfortunate that the organizers of this movement will not have the decency to name your grave when they have disposed of you. But, such would seem to be your fate.
You, also, presume too much. You do realize the event was streamed live and recorded, do you not? Assuming for the moment that your presumption you were the only one from these boards who was there, the presumption that I do not know what went on at this rally is horribly naive on your part.