The process of studying in my country is totally different than in other country's.Here as soon as you finish High-School you go to College(Law College is 3+2 years)+(2 Years for PHD if desired) and basically that is it.You're numbers are shocking to me as I am from one of the smallest countries with only 2 mill. people.So the numbers of students I told here is considered a big number for one University in my city.
Concerning your last paragraph,as I told you,I'm not speaking about State University's.I'm speaking about PRIVATE University's(Pay amount of money for every year you study there)so basically everyone can get into.
The only difference is the numbers of students between these tw

n that matter could you please be more direct.From what I read,you are saying the smaller one is better,right?
Ah, I see. I'm not incredibly familiar with the educational systems of other countries, and you never said where you were from. Because you expressed an interest in a national defense, I assumed you were American because that is a subject we are obsessed with.
Moving on to your question, yes, technically smaller is better for class size. However the size differences in your schools are still not significant, and they don't guarantee you'll have better ratio of students to teachers in the classes you'll be taking. Consider looking at the number of students in each law program compared to the number of teaching faculty.
Another thing you might consider is that even if one school has a better ratio of students to professors, the actual caliber of the professors may be lower at one or the other, regardless of the student population. Better faculty matter more than the number of students that they teach. Often times you can judge how good the faculty of an institution is by the faculty's average salary. The best teachers tend to be attracted to where they are paid best. Unfortunately, you are looking at private schools that may not disclose what they pay. You might be able to use your tuition as a rough metric where the school that requires you to pay the most likely pays their teachers the most, but that's making a big assumption. You could also look the amount of grant money he faculty brings in and whether they've published anything of major consequence in the last decade.
As I said last time, your numbers are so insignificantly different that you really shouldn't be making your decision on that factor alone. Your single best determining factor should be the percentage of students that graduate and are actually employeed in law from each university. Each school should have that statistic.
Do you like the ethical system of consequentialism? If an action brings out a greater good in the world, but the action itself was considered inhumane, do you think it's ethically right?
I think that some of the variations of consequentialism are valid ethical philosophies, and I can agree with them to some extent. I think your scenario is too broad a blanket statement. To me, the ethics of a situation can only be assessed by a case by case evaluation. For example, I think that if brutally killing one person would save billions of lives, the action is ethical. However, if you have to kill 49 people to save 50, it's not so ethical, even though you're doing net good.