Would you call "amatarasu solos" an effective argument? Itachi hasn't been known to use it straight off the bat anyway but i know people will bring it up as they already have. Ammy is the only supported way Itachi wins. Considering this is sick itachi that doesn't have edo itachi feats in terms of susano'os duration in being active, it can be countered. Not like im saying effortlessly renders susano'o uselss calm down.
-Him using it right off the bat has absolutely nothing to do with how effective it will be when used.
-lol, I can safely bet you that it isn't.
-Here we go, I already know that your main counter for Susanoo is Itachi's stamina, which is a very poor counter, it really isn't even a counter. Stamina is no factor when Itachi can take him down before it ever becomes a factor, he doesn't need to hold it up the whole match to beat this guy, don't even know where you got that from.
Used Tsukuyomi, Amaterasu multiple times in large quantities, Susanoo to defeat Orochimaru at the end, survive Kirin and died because of his illness, not because of chakra consumption as Susanoo was up to the end. He was able to do all that in a battle he purposely prolonged so he would die and you think that he can't use Susanoo long enough to defeat Sasori? When he can tank all of Sasori's attacks? lmao. not sure if serious.
Bold: It is indeed a very lame argument, thats all someone has to say, it would be pointless debating it
Uh what? If Amaterasu is all that is needed to take him out (not saying it is) then its as simple as that. If you disagree then just counter, that simple. Saying its pointless because its only Amaterasu is a ridiculous reason not to even bother countering it, especially in the chance where you can't even accurately refute it.
"lame argument" is not a rebuttal. Its an excuse.
aawww man kG you want me to handle this niga for you?
lmao, come in here with that Itachi's stamina is not bad argument you have. I can already tell its necessary.
