Totsuka isn't tanking a TBB. Certainly not Bee's quadra TBB.Hachibi did all that just so that Itachi can tank it? Damn.
Totsuka isn't tanking a TBB. Certainly not Bee's quadra TBB.Hachibi did all that just so that Itachi can tank it? Damn.
I mean B can run but Itachi is not losing sigh of him, the second he enters B he gets roasted by ama.Killer Bee wins mid diffiulty. In V2 form he is faster than Itachi so he retreats far away enough, then goes BM and forms Bijuu dama (something that can be done in seconds given Hachibis feat against Juubi). Nukes V4 Susanoo with 1 TBB.
Totsuka isn't supposed to tank anything, Yata is the defence.Totsuka isn't tanking a TBB. Certainly not Bee's quadra TBB.
Lol damn that's what I meant. But yeah, Yata isn't tanking a TBB, let alone 4. Itachi loses this one. Bee too strong.Totsuka isn't supposed to tank anything, Yata is the defence.
I'd say Yata tanks TBB without much trouble given it can change all its properties to negate any incoming attack. And no, no limits fallacy is not a real life fallacy, it's an ODB term created to keep cross-universe debates in check. You can't say Yata counters any attack in a universe were omnipotence and multi-universe busting attacks exist. Yata would, however, counter any attack within the NV realm of capabilities, given Kishi's statements on this matter. It's an ethereal shield which can counter any attack within NV. If you want to debunk this then the burden of proof is on you. Inb4 you try to use hyperboles as a means of debunking this, when there's no apparent hyperbole when its invincibility has been restated 4 times in canon, and the mechanics behind how it works has been given.Lol damn that's what I meant. But yeah, Yata isn't tanking a TBB, let alone 4. Itachi loses this one. Bee too strong.
I'm actually surprised though Beans said Bee wins. I was almost sure he'd go with Itachi but good because I would've had to light em up and that's my homie.
how long is he going to keep it up? 2 minutes? He gets shat on.I'd say Yata tanks TBB without much trouble given it can change all its properties to negate any incoming attack. And no, no limits fallacy is not a real life fallacy, it's an ODB term created to keep cross-universe debates in check. You can't say Yata counters any attack in a universe were omnipotence and multi-universe busting attacks exist. Yata would, however, counter any attack within the NV realm of capabilities, given Kishi's statements on this matter. It's an ethereal shield which can counter any attack within NV. If you want to debunk this then the burden of proof is on you. Inb4 you try to use hyperboles as a means of debunking this, when there's no apparent hyperbole when its invincibility has been restated 4 times in canon, and the mechanics behind how it works has been given.
Kept it up for quite some time after he had already manifested an entire v3 Susano and had it obliterated. So he manifested ANOTHER Susano and waited for Orochimaru to come out and start attacking, destroyed him and his Hydra, which he finished off by sealing him. And that's after his Tsukiyomi was broken, multiple Genjutsu, multiple Amateasu, a Katon, using a Crow Clone to split his chakra, etc. Please don't try this 'Itachi can barely keep Susano up' card, it's not going to work. It's only being used against BM and Hachibi isn't evading the Susano for long due to the speed and range of Totsuka's sword. He can fire his TBB's but Itachi's going to walk right through them.how long is he going to keep it up? 2 minutes? He gets shat on.
Bee don't need BM for Itachi. Itachi has to have at least v2 Susanoo for v2 Bee, or he gets destroyed. And how did you find Totsuka's speed impressive? Oh it took the head of couple of fodder snakes. It definitely can catch Bee.Kept it up for quite some time after he had already manifested an entire v3 Susano and had it obliterated. So he manifested ANOTHER Susano and waited for Orochimaru to come out and start attacking, destroyed him and his Hydra, which he finished off by sealing him. And that's after his Tsukiyomi was broken, multiple Genjutsu, multiple Amateasu, a Katon, using a Crow Clone to split his chakra, etc. Please don't try this 'Itachi can barely keep Susano up' card, it's not going to work. It's only being used against BM and Hachibi isn't evading the Susano for long due to the speed and range of Totsuka's sword. He can fire his TBB's but Itachi's going to walk right through them.
Don't intrude with an argument that was directed at someone else if you aren't going to use the same argument he was using smh. Tsukiyomi rapes him and v2 Susano being activated at the last second (no intel makes it a surprise factor) means he can grab Bee and guarantee the Tsukiyomi.Bee don't need BM for Itachi. Itachi has to have at least v2 Susanoo for v2 Bee, or he gets destroyed. And how did you find Totsuka's speed impressive? Oh it took the head of couple of fodder snakes. It definitely can catch Bee.
You gave Bee the intel of Itachi being a genjutsu expert. Then Bee knows Itachi is an Uchiha. Good luck with Susanoo trying to grab someone as fast as Bee.Don't intrude with an argument that was directed at someone else if you aren't going to use the same argument he was using smh. Tsukiyomi rapes him and v2 Susano being activated at the last second (no intel makes it a surprise factor) means he can grab Bee and guarantee the Tsukiyomi.
It never ceases to amaze me that Itachi fanboys actually try to defend this notion that Yata can repel any attack. There are countless hyperboles in the manga and databook but for some reason, people try to dismiss them all except this one. Kabutowari, one of the seven ninja swords, was stated to break through any defense, but it obviously doesn't. You are actually suggesting here that Yata tanks:I'd say Yata tanks TBB without much trouble given it can change all its properties to negate any incoming attack. And no, no limits fallacy is not a real life fallacy, it's an ODB term created to keep cross-universe debates in check. You can't say Yata counters any attack in a universe were omnipotence and multi-universe busting attacks exist. Yata would, however, counter any attack within the NV realm of capabilities, given Kishi's statements on this matter. It's an ethereal shield which can counter any attack within NV. If you want to debunk this then the burden of proof is on you. Inb4 you try to use hyperboles as a means of debunking this, when there's no apparent hyperbole when its invincibility has been restated 4 times in canon, and the mechanics behind how it works has been given.
Raikiri didn't. Raiden did. And at it stands I'd put raiden over v2 sword.Raikri has the power to chop those shrouds Susanoo sword >>>>>> Raikiri its game for Bee quit playing and its called tanked not ranked dumbass
The only justu that lives up to its hype in every way shape and form is kamui.It never ceases to amaze me that Itachi fanboys actually try to defend this notion that Yata can repel any attack. There are countless hyperboles in the manga and databook but for some reason, people try to dismiss them all except this one. Kabutowari, one of the seven ninja swords, was stated to break through any defense, but it obviously doesn't. You are actually suggesting here that Yata tanks:
-Shinsuusenju
-PS slashes
-Juubidama
-Ash bones
All because of a hyperbolic statement? This is just straight up wank. Absolutely no other way to put it.
Yeah, no. I don't need to debunk what you haven't prooved. This entire post literally holds no weight. You stated reasons why you think TBB would get tanked then asked me to debunk your reasons, which didn't prove it gets tanked in the first place.I'd say Yata tanks TBB without much trouble given it can change all its properties to negate any incoming attack. And no, no limits fallacy is not a real life fallacy, it's an ODB term created to keep cross-universe debates in check. You can't say Yata counters any attack in a universe were omnipotence and multi-universe busting attacks exist. Yata would, however, counter any attack within the NV realm of capabilities, given Kishi's statements on this matter. It's an ethereal shield which can counter any attack within NV. If you want to debunk this then the burden of proof is on you. Inb4 you try to use hyperboles as a means of debunking this, when there's no apparent hyperbole when its invincibility has been restated 4 times in canon, and the mechanics behind how it works has been given.
Raikiri and Jinton too. Both were hyped to cut through and turn anything it touches into dust and neither has failed in the series.The only justu that lives up to its hype in every way shape and form is kamui.
put a ration tech that's not kirin over any susanoo is silly as shitRaikiri didn't. Raiden did. And at it stands I'd put raiden over v2 sword.
just because suanno in the lower levels has good defense that means jack shit to its offence. garras sand tanked 4 susanno blades yet we all know it gets ripped to shreds if it comes anywhere near chidori. let alone raiden.put a ration tech that's not kirin over any susanoo is silly as shit
raikiri failed to v2 jin. which goes to show how durable those fcks are.Raikiri and Jinton too. Both were hyped to cut through and turn anything it touches into dust and neither has failed in the series.
Nah it cut them, just didn't go deep.raikiri failed to v2 jin. which goes to show how durable those fcks are.