^ clearly doesn't know what pseudo means LolDude this was clearly a psuedo-Itachi wank thread.
1. You had a round-about way of proclaiming Itachi as the most popular (Not saying I disagree)
2. You claimed most of the Itachi threads are from his haters (who I'm assuming are just those that don't believe he can beat every ninja in the manga), which I'm sure even his fanboys know that they are the ones keeping his name alive the most
3. You attempted to make fun of those who make fun of Itachi fanboys
But mostly it's because you making this thread just doesn't really make sense you know? You think that after everything you said, you'd be one of the few people making an Itachi analysis thread. You know the "fans" category
So clearly you don't hate Itachi, you're not a hater. You didn't analyze him with any match-ups, so you're not just a simple fan either. The only other group of people you mentioned were fanboys, sooo......
There was plenty hostility in your post - refer to the last 2 paragraphs.I guess you're welcome but that post wasn't really all that uncivil. You really think non fans bring him up more huh? I really don't see that many non fans make threads about him. I see them making more posts, but that's because they're making those posts in response to fanboy threads. And I definitely think Itachi is the most popular character to NB. I was talking to a guy today about how crazy it is that his name is mentioned so often in threads. You would think he's currently fighting in the war.
It means false, not genuine, or pretending to be something it isn't. I said pseudo wank thread because I felt like he genuinely was trying to wank Itachi and failed to do so properly, not because I felt like was trying to hide the wank, which is what I assume you thought I meant. So it's not a matter of me not knowing what the word means but you not knowing what I meant^ clearly doesn't know what pseudo means Lol
1. There was no hostility in my posts. I'm sorry if you're really that sensitive honestly I wasn't trying to offend you dude. It is the internet and I tend to naturally be very direct. So misunderstandings will happen. I'll take full responsibility for it dude.There was plenty hostility in your post - refer to the last 2 paragraphs.
Let me just give you a breakdown of the general scheme of itachi-type threads on nb.
> *this has never personally happened to me* Guy with itachi as Ava/sig posts in some thread about some topic. One guy calls him out for being an 'itachi fanboy' (also occurs with sasuke/naruto/etc), then the thread suddenly turns to a thread about itachi. In fact, just check your post, you tried to insult me with 'itachi fanboy'. Anyway, moving on...
> Some non-fan makes a thread about "dehyping the myth about yata", "dehyping the myth about itachi's genjutsu", "dehyping the myth about itachi's aids" or god knows what.
> some non-fan makes a thread about literally anyone (guy, tsunade, madara, hashirama, nagato, BSM naruto, juubito), just anyone in general, no matter how obvious can take on itachi. <- most common topic
> A fanboy creates a thread "solo-king". Hot thread.
> A legitimate fan creates a thread "Analysing itachi's speed/genjutsu/blah blah". Overrun by trolls, haters and fanboys to the point it's derailed. In some cases, the thread goes from the topic to some discussion about "xyz can defeat itachi, OP you're wanking" (see: Your previous post for attempting to say I was subtly trying to wank itachi with this thread).
So, yes, More times than not, you get non-fans flooding the place with topics revolving around itachi, then they try to instantly bash every and anyone they even assume is an itachi fan (see: You trying to bash me because you obviously saw itachi in my sig).
My end point? The people who seem to complain about itachi/his fanboys so much should just stop talking about him. Then we won't have to hear about him all the time. The guy's dead for christ's sake.
Well I wonder what Hashirama would say about this matter.Honorable Itachi is the greatest under Hashirama.
lol i'm never offended. You can't offend me on the internet or IRL. It's impossible and has never happened. However...1. There was no hostility in my posts. I'm sorry if you're really that sensitive honestly I wasn't trying to offend you dude. It is the internet and I tend to naturally be very direct. So misunderstandings will happen. I'll take full responsibility for it dude.
2. I didn't try to "insult" you with Itachi fanboy. You are focusing too much on that last part and again, I had no idea you were so sensitive. If you read the entire thing, it was about specifically the three groups of people you yourself categorized in your post. The entire point was this thread not making much sense with what you were saying. Just my opinion, but I thought you were actually trying to wank him, which is why I pointed out the ways I felt he was so obviously wanked, but I felt it wasn't done right because you making this thread contradicted other arguments. Only an opinion. Take it for a grain of salt or even less.
3. People make "dehyping" theads because that is a response to the hype. And where does the hype come from? Wankers who hype those particular things. And again, it makes no sense for you to say that, because a thread aimed to dehype or debunk a myth is done so with at least some manga evidence to argue why something isn't as cut and dry. It's an analysis, which you said was ok. Another reason why I didn't understand the point of this thread. Those that try to defend, debunk, and analyze why and how Itachi's moveset can't defeat everyone/everything are the haters you are speaking of? Why does that make them a hater or even a "non-fan"? They could simply be fans of Itachi who feel he's not as great as his fanboys do. I should know. I think Itachi is the most well rounded and impressive character in the manga. But I don't think he can beat everyone or any of his moves are good against everything.
4. Again, I was not trying to say you were subtly wanking. I was saying your wanking was full blown, but your arguments collapsed on themselves to me and did more to hurt your points than prove them.
5. Fool I didn't even notice your sig until you just something. I kind of remember seeing that gaara part slightly as I was scrolling down, but even then I didn't know it was your sig. I don't even bother looking at people's sigs. So no, I didn't get offended or assume anything off of something I didn't even notice. Why are you so defensive?
Your very last paragraph sums up my point nicely. I don't agree that people should stop talking about him, but in the same manner that if people stop giving him "hype", no one would have anything to dehype in response, you made a thread about Itachi that wasn't totally irrelevant to anything currently in the manga yet you say something like "he's dead for christ sake"? The fact that you also feel that if people who complain about the fanboys simply stop talking about him that his fanboys will stop making threads is also a little silly to me. I just don't get your logic. And above all else, for someone who cared enough about this topic to make this thread, I just thought you would've done an interesting analysis instead of feeding into the very thing you were trying to complain about
"But mostly it's because you making this thread just doesn't really make sense you know? You think that after everything you said, you'd be one of the few people making an Itachi analysis thread. You know the "fans" category So clearly you don't hate Itachi, you're not a hater. You didn't analyze him with any match-ups, so you're not just a simple fan either. The only other group of people you mentioned were fanboys, sooo......" That's clearly a sly attempt at mockery. In the same way you somehow found "itachi wanking" in here, is the same way I can see an attempt at mocking me Also, Just because I made a thread to categorize some of the general category people tend to fall into, when making an itachi thread, doesn't mean I need to be in one, within this thread. It's a high level analysis of a situation abstracting myself from the problem. I can't make a thread analyzing the abundance of itachi related posts... then expect to place myself into one of the categories I listed. EG. If I say "It's funny, There seems to be two types of people out there... Those that Eat meat and those that don't. The meat eaters blah blah blah... while the herbivores tend to blah blah..." what kind of person am I? You can't tell, because I'm generalizing the problem. But, here, You can try to 'deduce' what category i'm in based on what I have said/not said in the thread. So, you tried to sneakily interpret that I must be an Itachi fanboy! I just must, because I'm not talking about any of the things fitting into any of the categories I'm saying right? See? An Itachi thread is made, Instead of simply stating "I disagree, most threads don't fall into blah blah blah", you state "OP, You're contradicting yourself so the thread makes no sense". You can try to say you weren't being hostile if you won't, but at the end of the day, there's a lot of other things you could have said to remove the insinuated stupidity/insults Anyway I'm going to sleep. Zzz |
Kid if you say you weren't offended even though you responded as such to what you thought was me trying to insult you then alright.lol i'm never offended. You can't offend me on the internet or IRL. It's impossible and has never happened. However...
"But mostly it's because you making this thread just doesn't really make sense you know? You think that after everything you said, you'd be one of the few people making an Itachi analysis thread. You know the "fans" category
So clearly you don't hate Itachi, you're not a hater. You didn't analyze him with any match-ups, so you're not just a simple fan either. The only other group of people you mentioned were fanboys, sooo......"
That's clearly a sly attempt at mockery. In the same way you somehow found "itachi wanking" in here, is the same way I can see an attempt at mocking me
Also, Just because I made a thread to categorize some of the general category people tend to fall into, when making an itachi thread, doesn't mean I need to be in one, within this thread. It's a high level analysis of a situation abstracting myself from the problem. I can't make a thread analyzing the abundance of itachi related posts... then expect to place myself into one of the categories I listed. EG. If I say "It's funny, There seems to be two types of people out there... Those that Eat meat and those that don't. The meat eaters blah blah blah... while the herbivores tend to blah blah..." what kind of person am I? You can't tell, because I'm generalizing the problem. But, here, You can try to 'deduce' what category i'm in based on what I have said/not said in the thread. So, you tried to sneakily interpret that I must be an Itachi fanboy! I just must, because I'm not talking about any of the things fitting into any of the categories I'm saying right? See? An Itachi thread is made, Instead of simply stating "I disagree, most threads don't fall into blah blah blah", you state "OP, You're contradicting yourself so the thread makes no sense".
You can try to say you weren't being hostile if you won't, but at the end of the day, there's a lot of other things you could have said to remove the insinuated stupidity/insults
Anyway I'm going to sleep. Zzz
I second this.Kid if you say you weren't offended even though you responded as such to what you thought was me trying to insult you then alright.
If you really think that was a sly attempt at mockery when I just told you that I was under the impression that your intent was to wank itachi this entire time (so naturally I would refer to you as a fanboy, I even did so based on specifically what you yourself were saying in the thread, so it wasn't just a blind accusation) then alright
Essentially, everyone either eats meat or they don't. You have to be in one or the other. So that analogy doesn't work. You got mad at me for putting in one of the categories and saying you don't need to be in one when you used an example where you would definitely be apart of one or the other. And since you categorized everyone in regards to how the post when referring to Itachi, I assumed due to what I felt to be the clear wank for Itachi and disdain for those who have don't agree with his fanboys that you yourself were a fanboy.
Nothing sneaky about this. I've stated numerous times that I think you're a fanboy and that I thought you wanted this to be known. Yes you must be a fanoby, not because your post didn't fit into your own categories, but because of the exact opposite, they only fit into one, which again, I thought was done so on purpose.
The Itachi thread was made when you made the thread, not when I gave a response. See the stupidity in that? My post is truly irrelevant to be honest with you. As long as the fanboys keep making threads, everyone else will have to hear about it. Those that complain about you guys can stop talking if they want, but it won't keep you guys silent.
I'm sorry for pointing out in detail why your thread contradicts itself. Maybe I shouldn't have done that. Maybe I should've said "TenTen solos" instead. That would've been a smarter and more reasonable response to a thread rather than actually reading the thread and responding point by point to it's content? Smh
Yes there are a lot of things I could've said differently. I could've said "green eggs and ham". Next time if I see a thread of yours I'll do that instead of you know....responding to what was actually in the thread. And next time I will try harder to watch what I say so that you won't think I'm insulting you. Shame on me for every even thinking about placing any level of maturity on the shoulders of the reader. It's truly up to me to make sure you don't misunderstand me and get offended, rather than expect you to be mature enough to accept the fact that I wasn't trying to be rude and not be so hung up on an insinuation
I hope you have a great night man. Whether you're truly going to bed or not right now or not. I agree to disagree