Is there a mistake in Naruto Shippūden 3: Inheritors of the Will of Fire?

[Skull Knight]

Ok last night I was watching Naruto Shippūden 3: Inheritors of the Will of Fire and found a mistake in that movie.
The film concerns the potential outbreak of a Fourth Shinobi World War when ninja with kekkei genkai abilities begin to disappear from Kumogakure, Iwagakure, Kirigakure, and Sunagakure and one of the Shinobi or the hostages look alike Pakura of Sunagakure.

also this movie was made after the time-skip.
But Pakura died during 4th Kazekage's reign according to the anime.so how is it possible that Hiruko(villain of d movie) was able 2 abduct Pakura?even if he had robbed d grave of Pakura,i believe only thing he should got is all skeletons and bones.so is this a mistake in anime and movie timeline?

 

[Tingun]

Niether movies nor anime are canon.

 

[Edward]

Eh its a movie, i dont think its directly connected to the basic plot of the anime/manga

 

[Shichi]

The movies aren't cannon so it doesn't matter

 

[cptenn94]

Okay the manga is officially what happened in the naruto verse. Anime has fillers that are arcs that are not canon, but fit within the timeline. Movies are filler that fit neither in the manga timeline or anime timeline, and are just made for entertainment and additional revenue.

 

[Skull Knight]

Eh its a movie, i dont think its directly connected to the basic plot of the anime/manga

yeah i knw all d movie are not connected with d plot but this is lyk a blunder in the timeline on naruto series.

 

[AirWind]

Movies plotline tends to be confusing from time to time and they actually were independent in any character development as long as its still relevant inside NV context.

 

[Fountain]

Cannon cannon cannon cannon cannon cannnon... You know what's cannon right? A revolver, a pistol, a 45 or something like that. That's ****ing cannon. That's what cannon means, just say legit instead.

 

[UchihaKira]

yeah i knw all d movie are not connected with d plot but this is lyk a blunder in the timeline on naruto series.

How so? Its not a part of the timeline at all.

 

[UchihaKira]

Cannon cannon cannon cannon cannon cannnon... You know what's cannon right? A revolver, a pistol, a 45 or something like that. That's ****ing cannon. That's what cannon means, just say legit instead.

lol canon has a different meaning from cannon.

 

[oShux]

Movies are never considered part of the story

 

[UchihaKira]

Movies are never considered part of the story

Hahaha I like how that made it in ur sig xD

 

[KGB Kakuzu]

I'm to confused

I must say....Angel Beats is amazing! Don't stop dancing ^.^

Anyways, it depends. I know that there was a filler episode on Pakura that explained everything; however, it isn't cannon. The only cannon I recall with her is that she was seen, named, and then Lee was sent to take her. No explainstion of event/where. You may have also noticed that Hidden Mist guy in the film also appears as a sensor that reported Deidara and Sasori's defeat or what not.

Point is, I think a filler episode described her death. And even then the Movie is technically a non cannon source. Also,.did the movie not come out before her introduction. As such, if anything the anime would have gotten it wrong.

 

[raziel777]

I don't think it's the same character. Look what I found on narutopedia. It's an unnamed shinobi in the movie, I don't think they ever said it was Pakura

Pakura shares her character design with a Sunagakure kunoichi who was abducted by Hiruko for use with his Chimera Technique during the events of Naruto Shippūden 3: Inheritors of the Will of Fire.