Is hawkeye stronger than shanks

Hexuze

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
May 19, 2011
Messages
20,359
Reaction score
1,533
No, they're not equal. In terms of swordsmanship, yes Mihawk is better but Shanks will destroy Mihawk (with haki).
 

Laserz

Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2013
Messages
127
Reaction score
3
Tie until further feats/hype that would put either stronger than the other
 

drxdroopy

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
May 23, 2012
Messages
2,687
Reaction score
73
Shanks since he is one of the 4 emperors
 

Kuzan

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
782
Reaction score
57
I think Shanks has the edge, mainly because of his INSANE haki. The guy damaged a boat by standing on it, he wasn't even using his full power! In terms of swordsmanship it is probably Hawkeye>Shanks though.
 

Fujitora

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
723
Reaction score
36
They are equals until manga says otherwise. Being emperor doesn't mean you're stronger.
 

The 1 who knows

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jul 10, 2012
Messages
569
Reaction score
13
As for now i will say they are at par......because its said that heir battles have never been settled!!!!
However shanks is a swordsman and yet mihawk is the no. 1! swordsman...this either means shanks doesnt want to challenge mihawk n beat hm or he simply cant bcoz hawky is stronger!!!!!!!!!
we also need to remember that as warlord.....mihawk does as he wants....even the government doesnt tell him shiit
however.....shanks went toe to toe with WB while mihawk tested his strongest slash ( which i believe isunderated) and
jozu stopped it...so that says asomething strengthwise
 

WhistleBlower

Legendary Shinobi 🐸
Supreme
Joined
Apr 12, 2012
Messages
27,716
Reaction score
1,797
Lol, no he isn't. Although at that stage where your at, since we havn't seen much of Shanks you would believe his "top dog". But really his on par with Shanks. Not stronger. Not weaker.

Hope this helps!! haha
 

Hyugaaa

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Feb 20, 2013
Messages
597
Reaction score
31
Eh, it's close but I would say that Shanks is better all around.
 

Yellow Spark

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
80
Come on guys. Shanks wins
shanks is weaker than whitebeard but fought him with one hand. Only 8 or some came to marineford and the war was called off.. Why? The three admirals would have beaten them if shanks<mihawk< admiral.
So, shanks is really strong. And maybe they were talking of a battle of stone, paper, scissors with both hand.. And shanks didnt have one hand to play it...
 

Yellow Spark

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
1,314
Reaction score
80
Come on guys. Shanks wins
shanks is weaker than whitebeard but fought him with one hand. Only 8 or some came to marineford and the war was called off.. Why? The three admirals would have beaten them if shanks<mihawk< admiral.
So, shanks is really strong. And maybe they were talking of a battle of stone, paper, scissors with both hand.. And shanks didnt have one hand to play it...
 

naruttebayo

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Oct 27, 2011
Messages
5,525
Reaction score
478
naah sanks was on par with WB
while hawkeye not

you go on challenging stronger guy not weaker
hawkeye used to challenge him
 

shri3kbat

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Aug 30, 2012
Messages
953
Reaction score
30
Mihawk hasn't even tested clashing with Whitebeard, how can you be so sure he would do worse than Shanks? Not that even if he did it says anything about Shanks vs Mihawk, it's a totally different matchup.
Shanks might be stronger, but clearly in their duels they were equal and that was before Shanks lost his arm.
I have a hard time believing Shanks fought Mihawk with just a one hander. That would make him better wouldn't it?
Two-hander vs two-hander would be a fair fight. I can see Shanks was able to keep up with Mihawk because of being stronger/having better haki, so what would he do now that he has a two-hander handicap?
Fight the world's strongest swordsman with a one-hander? Anyways if Shanks was in fact able to duel Mihawk with one hand Mihawk would not deserve his title. Well, maybe he was just using that dagger :p

Anyways for it to make sense with Mihawk's title and the fact they were equal before, Mihawk is at least slightly > Shanks if they were to duel again.
 

Kuzan

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
782
Reaction score
57
Mihawk hasn't even tested clashing with Whitebeard, how can you be so sure he would do worse than Shanks? Not that even if he did it says anything about Shanks vs Mihawk, it's a totally different matchup.
Shanks might be stronger, but clearly in their duels they were equal and that was before Shanks lost his arm.
I have a hard time believing Shanks fought Mihawk with just a one hander. That would make him better wouldn't it?
Two-hander vs two-hander would be a fair fight. I can see Shanks was able to keep up with Mihawk because of being stronger/having better haki, so what would he do now that he has a two-hander handicap?
Fight the world's strongest swordsman with a one-hander? Anyways if Shanks was in fact able to duel Mihawk with one hand Mihawk would not deserve his title. Well, maybe he was just using that dagger :p

Anyways for it to make sense with Mihawk's title and the fact they were equal before, Mihawk is at least slightly > Shanks if they were to duel again.

Shanks can block Whitebeards slash with one hand, but not Mihawk's? That makes no sense.
 

Fujitora

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 24, 2013
Messages
723
Reaction score
36
Shanks = Mihawk.

Anyone who says otherwise needs to show panels, immediately!
 
Top