Internet couples : Possible or just a Substitute?

Aertes

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
4,667
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
I'm actually too bored to continue this argument (No disrespect intended, but didn't even read it due to it becoming too boring). So, once again Chiharu, just going to have to agree to disagree. If you want to ask personal questions, you know where to find me.
Then get your bored ass outta this thread and don't reply with the "didn't read lol" thing (no disrespect intended, but I was too bored to pretend to be polite due to my intolerance to idiotic responses).
So you can disagree on something you didn't even read? What kind of sorcery is that? If I wanted to ask personal questions to you or Franken I would just do it, I wouldn't spend my time composing that lil'wallie. But actually wanted to reply to the thread and to both of you.
 

Frankenstein

Active member
Veteran
Joined
Jun 16, 2012
Messages
4,579
Kin
0💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Awards
Dude, what the hell? How does that not make any sense? I'm sure everyone would agree that your argument is illogical due to what I pointed out. The evidence of your flawed logic is there for everyone to see, just own up to it and move on.
Listen to me, Yami. Over the last 3 days you have become the greatest supporter of online love. A great ambassador of it.
The reason is obvious to me by now. Obviously you like those relationships more than "real life" relationships and you have convinced yourself that this is healthy and for some reason you want to convince us that this is true too.
I don't know why you have this stance. Possibly you fear that you will fail in real life? Possibly you want to deny by all means that it is a substitute because you just can't accept it? I don't know and I won't judge.

You have used valid arguments, invalid arguments, dodging and ignoring arguments, bullshit, flawed statistics, cheap tactics against the OP, twisting words and statistics, everything. I have tolerated all these. What I am not gonna tolerate though is to deny logic in my thread. I didn't make this thread for you and you have more than stayed in it. So I am no more interested in discussing with you.
After all you have monopolized this thread to the point that it has become a debate between you and me. I don't have a problem with debates but first of all that's not the purpose of this thread and second of all I know that whatever I say will not convince you because you are clinging to false logic to actually defend yourself.

I have no intention to provide you with the satisfaction that you have won this debate so that you feel better or any intention to continue discussing with a man that isn't using logic.
 

Disquiet

Active member
Supreme
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
32,590
Kin
2💸
Kumi
0💴
Trait Points
0⚔️
Then get your bored ass outta this thread and don't reply with the "didn't read lol" thing (no disrespect intended, but I was too bored to pretend to be polite due to my intolerance to idiotic responses).
So you can disagree on something you didn't even read? What kind of sorcery is that? If I wanted to ask personal questions to you or Franken I would just do it, I wouldn't spend my time composing that lil'wallie. But actually wanted to reply to the thread and to both of you.

....Yeah I didn't 'read' it but skimmed through it, and don't feel like writing out an argument at this moment ( a lot of these arguments are just repetition), this has been going on for several pages. Anyways, I saw your post and acknowledged it, was just stating my reason for putting it off at the moment. But whatever, I understand perfectly now.



Listen to me, Yami. Over the last 3 days you have become the greatest supporter of online love. A great ambassador of it.
The reason is obvious to me by now. Obviously you like those relationships more than "real life" relationships and you have convinced yourself that this is healthy and for some reason you want to convince us that this is true too.
I don't know why you have this stance. Possibly you fear that you will fail in real life? Possibly you want to deny by all means that it is a substitute because you just can't accept it? I don't know and I won't judge.
Not more than real life, nor do I believe I will fail in it. I'm actually not at all afraid of the concept of failing. I'll continue to move forward always. Though, a lot of the stuff you noticed is obvious, it is no secret to anyone who really knows me on here. Don't worry about judging me, I've never been afraid to be judged by anyone.

You have used valid arguments, invalid arguments, dodging and ignoring arguments, bullshit, flawed statistics, cheap tactics against the OP, twisting words and statistics, everything. I have tolerated all these. What I am not gonna tolerate though is to deny logic in my thread. I didn't make this thread for you and you have more than stayed in it. So I am no more interested in discussing with you.
After all you have monopolized this thread to the point that it has become a debate between you and me. I don't have a problem with debates but first of all that's not the purpose of this thread and second of all I know that whatever I say will not convince you because you are clinging to false logic to actually defend yourself.

I have no intention to provide you with the satisfaction that you have won this debate so that you feel better or any intention to continue discussing with a man that isn't using logic.

So have you, there's no animosity here. The discussion may have got heated at times (maybe?), but as I try handle all my discussions that ends, no hard feelings and was enjoyable as well as a constructive learning experience (At least for me). You and Chiharu both put forth good arguments. But anyways, I'm officially done.


EDIT- Though there's no denying the significance in the flawed logic I pointed out like 2-3 posts ago.
 
Last edited:
Top