[Question] Image restrictions

[amarusboobs]

The current image restriction to be is kinda of weird, I liked it when it would resize your image and it would do it proportionally.

But noy the pic you have has to be the standard 150x200 before you put upload.

When you edit your pic to make it smaller, it looses quality.

I'm not complaining, but was this necessary..?

 

[BazzBee]

If resized properly the picture's quality stays the same, by properly i mean by a good software such as Photoscape.

 

[amarusboobs]

If resized properly the picture's quality stays the same, by properly i mean by a good software such as Photoscape.

I don't have time for that anymore :dunno:

 

[Zoids]

Yes...yes it is.

 

[BazzBee]

Flucking signature size is 600x300...BS!

I think that is equally fair since on other various forums the the permanent size is 250x300 and that's even worse.

 

[MinatoTheYellowFlash]

I think that is equally fair since on other various forums the the permanent size is 250x300 and that's even worse.

I don't care what's worse on other forums/sites, I'm only entitled to the restrictions on the site I go to. All in all, it still sucks.

 

[BazzBee]

I don't care what's worse on other forums/sites, I'm only entitled to the restrictions on the site I go to. All in all, it still sucks.

#DealWithIt

 

[Akasha]

If you think it looks bad when it is auto risezed and don't have time to resize it yourself just make a request in this subforum.

You must be registered for see links

Somebody will do it for you!