Would he have been able to beat arlong without getting touched?
You must be registered for see images
Conqueror's Haki GGWould he have been able to beat arlong without getting touched?
You must be registered for see images
Conqueror's Haki GG
I think I need some more convincingConquer Haki solos :|
Conquer Haki solos :|
Yeah conqueror's Haki probly isn't that simple of a win on this one. Maybe, but I doubt it.Conqueror's Haki GG
Even if Kings Haki doesn't do the job, color of Observations would be enough to ensure that he doesn't get hit. :|Yeah conqueror's Haki probly isn't that simple of a win on this one. Maybe, but I doubt it.
OT: Yes I think with just gear 2 there's a good chance he'd win without being touched.
Severe Overkill :| atp Arlong would be a stainHe could just one shot him with grizzly magnum
I doubt haoshuko haki would work, arlong was weak, however his conviction about his ideals was fairly strong. He may get sacred and become unable to move, but he won't get knocked out. His willpower is definitely not weaker than the new fishmen pirates which even luffy's haki couldn't knock out.He would die :|
A weak conquerors haki gg
To the CoC question, yes. Arlong was probably stronger than the 50,000 who got KO'd and even if he ended up not being physically stronger than each of them, physical strength isn't the factor for CoC it's the will and Arlong had a better resolve then those 50,000 fishmen. Honestly, I think Hody without any steroids at all is either just below or = Arlong, he had no real impressive feats and the stuff that was somewhat impressive was thanks to about 100 super steroids. Part 1 characters always have a hard time getting their recognition, Arlong can't compete with any of the new characters thanks to power scaling but he was a tough opponent.Why do you not think he can one shot Arlong with CoC Haki when Luffy was able to do it to 50,000 fishman. Do you think those fishman were weaker than Arlong?
Even with that, Luffy one shot a pacifista with one Jet Pistol. Pacifista >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Arlong.
I'm starting to even doubt this thread is serious.