[Debate] If Abortion Isnt Murder Why Are Killers Charged With Double Homicide?

Is Abortion Murder?

  • Yes

    Votes: 13 61.9%
  • No

    Votes: 8 38.1%

  • Total voters
    21

Solidus Solidus Solidus

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Dec 4, 2014
Messages
6,962
Reaction score
694
It's not just a woman's body, it's also the life of a child. Saying that it's just the woman's body trivializes the conversation and decreases its true weight just so it's convenient for you to believe in what you believe without guilt. If you can't look at the situation for what it fully is then you have no place in the conversation.

But the overall conversation started with us discussion on men's right on pregnancy. The pregnancy itself was brought up by you after joining the conversation, so you should be the last one judging whereas someone has a place here or not.
 

FreakensteinAG

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Dec 20, 2012
Messages
5,227
Reaction score
785
Explain why a man has to pay child support if he decides he doesn't want to take care of the kid

We've already explained that once the child is born, the man and woman have equal rights to the child. However, while the child is en utero, the rights belong to the woman.
 

Pumpkin Ninja

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
15,554
Reaction score
1,857
Nah, it's her body. So her decision. You are a sexist if you try to take one of the most common rules of humanity- the decision on your own body-out.
The argument isn't that simple because another body is involved. The my body logic can apply to aborting a child 8 months into pregnancy. Obviously they don't do that but the argument still applies. I agree it's more of her decision but it's not as black and white as you think.
 

ComplexCity

Banned
Elite
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
242
We've already explained that once the child is born, the man and woman have equal rights to the child. However, while the child is en utero, the rights belong to the woman.

Ok and Riker already played the devils advocate and switched roles after the child was born. Not understanding some of the logic here.
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
But the overall conversation started with us discussion on men's right on pregnancy. The pregnancy itself was brought up by you after joining the conversation, so you should be the last one judging whereas someone has a place here or not.
No, it's common sense that if a person has to diminish the significance of the situation to justify their viewpoint, then their viewpoint is flawed. Freakenstein essentially displayed that the full picture is too heavy, so he crops it and focuses on a simple part to feel justified about his viewpoint. That inherently makes your viewpoint worth nothing.

If you cannot look at the full situation, if you cannot acknowledge it for what it fully is, then how can you talk about it? How can you make a viable judgement on a topic when you only acknowledge one piece of it to make it easier?

Ok and Riker already played the devils advocate and switched roles after the child was born. Not understanding some of the logic here.

What?
 

Pumpkin Ninja

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
15,554
Reaction score
1,857
On abortion, virtually zero. After birth, 50%.

Why should a woman have the right to abort because it inconveniences her but a man must take care of the child or pay for 18 years if she says so. If her say in keeping it or not impacts the man's life as well, it should be both their decision.
 

Pumpkin Ninja

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Oct 31, 2012
Messages
15,554
Reaction score
1,857
Because he was too dumb to pull off in the right time.
You always get some sort of punishment for doing bad things.

But no punishment for her allowing him to not wear a condom. It takes two to make a child.
 

ComplexCity

Banned
Elite
Joined
Apr 7, 2014
Messages
5,721
Reaction score
242
Still waiting for someone to refute Lucy's original point. When a woman/man is married if a prenup is not signed then they are entitled to half of their husband/wifes possessions legally even if the other person did not contribute.

Trying to understand how some of this logic is trying to be passed if the man is involved
 

Punk Hazard

Sage of Six Posts 🔮
Immortal
Joined
Apr 21, 2011
Messages
59,557
Reaction score
4,729
Now that we are talking about the child itself, we have to go back to the issue of "at what stage(s) do we consider abortion legal/illegal", which we should have done in the very beginning of the thread. There is no trivialization of the debate considering the conception of the embryo is staged in the woman's body. It is absolutely about the woman's body, considering an abortion is a type of surgery.

The woman's body is part of the conversation, it is not the entire conversation. It is only one thing that is taken into consideration. When you make it the ONLY thing that's taken into consideration, then your viewpoint cannot be part of the conversation, as the conversation is about something far greater.

What you're doing is the equivalent of looking a case where someone murdered in self defense, ignoring the self-defense part, focusing entirely on there being a murder, and saying they should go to jail.
 
Top