Human Brain's Memory Capacity = Entire World Wide Web

Waindo

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,259
Reaction score
1,095
?Human Brain's Memory Capacity = Entire World Wide Web


iflscience.com

You must be registered for see images

Researchers now believe the human brain may have a memory capacity comparable to the entire World Wide Web

Like a computer, the brain has a storage capacity that determines how much memory it can hold. However, while computing power can be neatly measured in bits, the amount of information that the brain can process depends upon the strength of the electrical signals that are passed between neurons. Understanding how these signals are mediated is, therefore, essential if we are to discover the brain’s overall memory capacity.

Although a precise measurement for this capacity has never been agreed upon, a new study that appeared in the journal eLife has suggested that previous rough estimates may have significantly underestimated the brain's memory storage capabilities. In fact, they suggest our memory capacity may be as much as ten times greater than we thought.

Neuronal cells communicate with one another via appendages called axons and dendrites, with the former carrying electrical signals away from the cell body and the latter conducting these impulses towards the cell body. An axon of one neuron meets with a dendrite of another at a junction called a synapse, the size of which determines the strength of the signals that can be transmitted. The number of different signal strengths that can be generated at each synapse dictates how much information can be processed, which means the brain’s overall memory capacity depends on the number of synapses it contains and the number of possible synaptic strengths.

Until recently, it had been presumed that synapses existed in a relatively low number of different sizes. However, the study authors discovered something that challenged this: first they noticed some axons formed two synapses with a single dendrite, and that these differed in size by a very small amount – typically around eight percent.

This suggests that synaptic size can vary by very precise measures, and that signal strengths can subsequently be very intricately controlled. Using a process called serial section electron microscopy to create a 3D reconstruction of a portion of brain tissue, the team identified 26 different possible synaptic strengths, which means each synapse should be able to generate 4.7 bit of memory. This is roughly ten times more than had previously been thought.

You must be registered for see images

Synaptic strength is much more variable than previously thought.

This suggests that synaptic size can vary by very precise measures, and that signal strengths can subsequently be very intricately controlled. Using a process called serial section electron microscopy to create a 3D reconstruction of a portion of brain tissue, the team identified 26 different possible synaptic strengths, which means each synapse should be able to generate 4.7 bit of memory. This is roughly ten times more than had previously been thought.

To regulate this strength, synapses change size in response to the intensity of the information being delivered along the axon – a process known as synaptic plasticity. This occurs via an influx of calcium into the neck of the dendrite, thereby increasing the surface area of the synapse and allowing more signals to be transmitted across the gap.

Since the brain contains several trillion synapses, the researchers believe their calculations point to a truly staggering processing power. Study ( ) coauthor Terry Sejnowski explained in a statement that “our new measurements of the brain's memory capacity increase conservative estimates by a factor of 10 to at least a petabyte, in the same ballpark as the World Wide Web,” adding that we might be able to use this information to improve computer design.​
 
Last edited:

Gerkak

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 11, 2012
Messages
16,382
Reaction score
1,192
Impressive.
 

Phact

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
1,076
Reaction score
60
I read a study if you unlock a bit of your brain (we dont use much of it) we could achieve greater things
 

Nobel

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Nov 17, 2015
Messages
3,263
Reaction score
245
Thanks captian obvious :sdo:
 

Waindo

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,259
Reaction score
1,095
I read a study if you unlock a bit of your brain (we dont use much of it) we could achieve greater things

We use approximately 10% of our brain power/capacity. I can't even imagine what would we be able to achieve with full capacity.
 

Phact

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Mar 28, 2014
Messages
1,076
Reaction score
60
We use approximately 10% of our brain power/capacity. I can't even imagine what would we be able to achieve with full capacity.

no i think its 20 not sure though, but if we reached 100% read it would be too op etc (watch lucy lol)
 

Υαmí

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Mar 10, 2014
Messages
12,009
Reaction score
808
I heard that the ten percent myth was fake.

I wish I had the process capacity for all of that information.
 

Waindo

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,259
Reaction score
1,095
You should get a A in class.

An A*
How is that related w this article? You know you have the FG section to increase your post count?
And actually I hated school. Even though I graduated with a B+ I almost never opened a school textbook trough entirety of my highschool education.
 

Natsu Shazneel

Banned
Supreme
Joined
Jan 21, 2012
Messages
37,690
Reaction score
1,999
An A*
How is that related w this article? You know you have the FG section to increase your post count?
And actually I hated school. Even though I graduated with a B+ I almost never opened a school textbook trough entirety of my highschool education.

I was grading your brain capacity.
 

Waindo

Kage in the Making 👑
Legendary
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
18,259
Reaction score
1,095
That's a myth.

That's why I said "approximately", if we were using a marginally bigger percentage in global, the Earth most probably wouldn't be a massive pile of sh*t it is today.
 
Top