how was life started?

HashiramaDescendant

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Mar 9, 2012
Messages
5,587
Reaction score
544
We are not entirely sure, but it is believed to have started with a Big Bang.
Either way we cut it, no one knows how life started. Asking what started the Big Bang is like asking who created the god(s) who created the universe.
 

-6 Paths-

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
781
Reaction score
191
how was life started according to scientists since you guys seem to be using thier studies for all of your anserws.

Educate yourself on these subjects on places that are more suited for that than NB, instead of constantly spamming retarded, annoying, pointless threads all day, you dense son of a bitch.
 

Ludicrous

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Dec 22, 2012
Messages
1,567
Reaction score
151
Ok it looks like no one said this but amino acids were spontaneously made from elements at the early years (about 3 billion years ago) of Earth's history. Then with the slim chance, those amino acids gathered to form proteins and then on to form cells which make organisms. Eventually, organisms evolved and here we are.

Or you could say god created us.
 

Kaneki Kun

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
5,019
Reaction score
474
Electric Spark theory.
Electric sparks can generate amino acids and sugars from an atmosphere loaded with water, methane, ammonia and hydrogen, as was shown in the famous Miller-Urey experiment reported in 1953, suggesting that lightning might have helped create the key building blocks of life on Earth in its early days. Over millions of years, larger and more complex molecules could form. Although research since then has revealed the early atmosphere of Earth was actually hydrogen-poor, scientists have suggested that volcanic clouds in the early atmosphere might have held methane, ammonia and hydrogen and been filled with lightning as well.

Community Clay theory

The first molecules of life might have met on clay, according to an idea elaborated by organic chemist Alexander Graham Cairns-Smith at the University of Glasgow in Scotland. These surfaces might not only have concentrated these organic compounds together, but also helped organize them into patterns much like our genes do now.

The main role of DNA is to store information on how other molecules should be arranged. Genetic sequences in DNA are essentially instructions on how amino acids should be arranged in proteins. Cairns-Smith suggests that mineral crystals in clay could have arranged organic molecules into organized patterns. After a while, organic molecules took over this job and organized themselves.

Deep-Sea Vents theory

The deep-sea vent theory suggests that life may have begun at submarine hydrothermal vents, spewing key hydrogen-rich molecules. Their rocky nooks could then have concentrated these molecules together and provided mineral catalysts for critical reactions. Even now, these vents, rich in chemical and thermal energy, sustain vibrant ecosystems.

Chilly Start

Ice might have covered the oceans 3 billion years ago, as the sun was about a third less luminous than it is now. This layer of ice, possibly hundreds of feet thick, might have protected fragile organic compounds in the water below from ultraviolet light and destruction from cosmic impacts. The cold might have also helped these molecules to survive longer, allowing key reactions to happen.

RNA World theory

Nowadays DNA needs proteins in order to form, and proteins require DNA to form, so how could these have formed without each other? The answer may be RNA, which can store information like DNA, serve as an enzyme like proteins, and help create both DNA and proteins. Later DNA and proteins succeeded this "RNA world," because they are more efficient. RNA still exists and performs several functions in organisms, including acting as an on-off switch for some genes. The question still remains how RNA got here in the first place. And while some scientists think the molecule could have spontaneously arisen on Earth, others say that was very unlikely to have happened.
Other nucleic acids other than RNA have been suggested as well, such as the more esoteric PNA or TNA.

Instead of developing from complex molecules such as RNA, life might have begun with smaller molecules interacting with each other in cycles of reactions. These might have been contained in simple capsules akin to cell membranes, and over time more complex molecules that performed these reactions better than the smaller ones could have evolved, scenarios dubbed "metabolism-first" models, as opposed to the "gene-first" model of the "RNA world" hypothesis.

Panspermia theory

Perhaps life did not begin on Earth at all, but was brought here from elsewhere in space, a notion known as panspermia. For instance, rocks regularly get blasted off Mars by cosmic impacts, and a number of Martian meteorites have been found on Earth that some researchers have controversially suggested brought microbes over here, potentially making us all Martians originally. Other scientists have even suggested that life might have hitchhiked on comets from other star systems. However, even if this concept were true, the question of how life began on Earth would then only change to how life began elsewhere in space.

Hope this helped you.
You can do further research on these theory's by searching them up if you want.
I apologize if I was rude to you earlier.
Lord Madara is Elegance.
 
Last edited:

Zaphkiel

Seraph
Joined
Mar 18, 2013
Messages
12,878
Reaction score
487
How life started: According to scientists.

There was a single atom, it was matter, and matter was tiny as you can imagine. Then, instability, from an unknown source, possibly within the atom it self caused the first ever nuclear fission. Now Nuclear Fission behaves different on Earth and in Space because at the beginning of time who knows what that atom was floating/lying/existing in. So this fission or nuclear reaction occurs, then, more nuclear reactions. In other words, a massive, continuous chain of nuclear reactions. Think of Konan's 30 Billion Paper Bombs jutsu but only never ending. Mass, particles, matter, anti matter, energy, dark energy, light, darkness, and everything in between sprouted from this cosmic phenomenon. Billions of years passed, molecules group together based on charge and negative energy (the energy found between two objects in extreme close proximity but never touching) sometimes confused with Van der Waals forces. These molecules accumilated on the cooled down state of a red planet later to be named Earth. These molecules developed complex bonds, and formed the primordial soup. In this soup was the blue print to all life. And with the Earth's dropping temperatures and erupting volcanoes spewing various harsh chemicals into the air a 'Global Warming Effect' took place, this allowed an atmosphere on the floating rock in space, a horrible atmosphere albeit, nothing could survive. But of course, nothing lived yet. Take a look at Venus' atmosphere for reference. Molecules bonded, detached, interacted, in fact scientists have made a simulated sample of primordial soup before, and to the world's surprise molecules interacted with each other. Now from there you can assume molecules became cells and then from there boom! Us.

My theory is: What if God isn't a being, as we all assume but a force. The force that caused the Big Bang, the force that keeps the Universe expanding. What if God is an 'it' and not a 'He'. The very fabric of reality, that would explain why 'he' is everywhere and nowhere wouldn't you think?
 

Wabbit

Banned
Legendary
Joined
Nov 15, 2011
Messages
11,335
Reaction score
797
Big bang theory tells how the universe came into existance
Formation of our planet and this ecosysteme and forming of life in the planet is different
post #26 gave the answer
 

Poptart

Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
180
Reaction score
26
Aliens held giant group orgys which generated extraterrestrial sperms which traveled to the Earth in a meteorite and created life.
 

Oblivionx

Anbu Operative 🎭
Veteran
Joined
Apr 29, 2013
Messages
4,526
Reaction score
204
science doesn't know how life was created or else life would have been created in laboratories by now...! it does make sense that things happen without a reason n automatically, look around you, and nature will surprise you every once in a while...! and it also makes sense that there is a supreme creator because that's how humans have lived their lives, it's coherent with human nature.... that's why there are atheists and then religious people....
and you seem annoyed with atheists...! and they are annoyed of religions....! so why are people still making religion related threads??
 

NarutoB

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jul 24, 2011
Messages
9,383
Reaction score
758
science doesn't know how life was created or else life would have been created in laboratories by now...! it does make sense that things happen without a reason n automatically, look around you, and nature will surprise you every once in a while...! and it also makes sense that there is a supreme creator because that's how humans have lived their lives, it's coherent with human nature.... that's why there are atheists and then religious people....
and you seem annoyed with atheists...! and they are annoyed of religions....! so why are people still making religion related threads??

No correlation between the two.
 

Kishi Uzumaki

Sannin of the Scrolls 📜
Elite
Joined
Jan 4, 2013
Messages
5,362
Reaction score
646
Some Scientists say first life forms came from the outer space ( bacteria's that came with meteorites or parts left from comets ) and some scientist say first life forms born here as simple cells ( procaryotes , I think this is the name it's called ) and later developed in to cyanobactiria to complex cells to multi cellular life to simple animals and through evolution to today's life forms live in the world .
 

Rιver

Banned
Veteran
Joined
May 17, 2014
Messages
3,025
Reaction score
202
Why are you asking a question that cannot be answered for now? If scientists are struggling with it, then how in the damn hell are people from NB answering a question that's been debated for centuries with too many results, Lol.
 

narutokage99

Jōnin Strategist 🧠
Regular
Joined
Jun 9, 2012
Messages
1,578
Reaction score
107
Evolution of life from inorganic matter is impossible, no matter how much Time you add. Even if you begin with a gene (we'll take it for granted that it just magically appeared over time, and was able to reproduce itself), in order for classical evolution to occur, the genome must increase in information content, and that simply does not happen (mutations sometimes duplicate information (which, again, is ALREADY present), but mostly corrupt it). And even if it did, you still need a mechanism in place to express that information and put it to use. There is no such mechanism that could have started it all, and increased information and complexity without an intelligent source.
 

Cornson

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
910
Reaction score
55
some of you guys answered my question about evoluton but not about this.

how was life started according to scientists since you guys seem to be using thier studies for all of your anserws.

We, honestly don't know yet, we have a few theories about how life could have happened, but we don't know yet.
 

Cornson

Leaf Village Regular 🍃
Regular
Joined
Mar 12, 2013
Messages
910
Reaction score
55
The big bang theory -

the big bank theory is about how the universe came in to existence... (and the op was asking how life on earth starter) it's like if you wore asked whats your favorite color and you answered Lamborghini...
 

Mille Ignis

Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2012
Messages
116
Reaction score
29
some of you guys answered my question about evoluton but not about this.

how was life started according to scientists since you guys seem to be using thier studies for all of your anserws.

We do not know exactly how life started, but scientist are working on it. Moreover, even though scientists do not have the answers, it doesn't make sense to use a deity or deities as an answer. It only creates more questions without really answering how life started. For instance, using a deity only tells us how life started on Earth but not in Heaven, if we assume that consciousness is a byproduct of life.
Also using a deity to fill in gaps where science has to answers is simply called God of the Gaps, and even theologians look down on such nonsense.

f Big Bang created everything, how was the Big Bang even created?
What came before the Big Bang?

Well this question can easily be flipped back onto you.

If God created everything who/what created God?
Was there anything before God?
How did God come into existence?
etc...


We actually have mathematical models that describe the universe before the Big Bang by the way. We just don't know what happened to cause the Big Bang since as we approach the Big Bang either from before it happened or after it happened, our models run off to infinity; thus, it creates a singularity in which the laws of physics break down.
 

Poptart

Member
Joined
May 2, 2014
Messages
180
Reaction score
26
Time to get serious. The Big Bang Theory created the goddamn universe and the Earth itself, by extension, not the life on Earth.

The early Earth's atmosphere had all the necessary ingredients for life - Oxygen, and many other minerals in the land - save one: Carbon. Carbon, which is the very base for our existence, reached the Earth only through meteorites that rained down when the Solar System was still very young.
 
Top