I was thinking about how well the first arcs of Naruto were, the cleverness and intricacy of the Chunin exam stages, the shinobi system + plethora of jutsus, the various sources of Asian lore, myth and modern works (anime and manga) that make up the NV, and how good the characters were in Part 1 and the Akatsuki part of Part 2.
We know Kishi lost his editor after the Pein arc, and things went downhill with the war arc, but how much of what made Naruto great, was really from Kishimoto in the first place? Thinking about it all, and how Naruto finished, there had to be a man or team behind the curtain who was throwing out all these ideas and keeping the story straight.
What do you think?
----
An old thread of mine, where we discussed and tried to catalog all the sources and lore Kishi pulled from to add to the NV.
We know Kishi lost his editor after the Pein arc, and things went downhill with the war arc, but how much of what made Naruto great, was really from Kishimoto in the first place? Thinking about it all, and how Naruto finished, there had to be a man or team behind the curtain who was throwing out all these ideas and keeping the story straight.
What do you think?
----
An old thread of mine, where we discussed and tried to catalog all the sources and lore Kishi pulled from to add to the NV.
You must be registered for see links